From: "Avery Pennarun" <apenwarr@gmail.com>
To: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: "Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>,
"Johannes Sixt" <j.sixt@viscovery.net>,
"Johannes Schindelin" <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
"Peter Karlsson" <peter@softwolves.pp.se>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Git on Windows, CRLF issues
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 19:04:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <32541b130804231604r4c439fa5va5c01bfd53a22cc7@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vprsgqiq1.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
On 4/23/08, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> But once you start saying "even originally the same blob (i.e. identified
> by one object name) can be rewritten into different result, depending on
> where in the tree it appears", would it make sense to have blob filters to
> begin with?
>
> Shouldn't that kind of of context sensitive (in the space dimension -- you
> can introduce the context sensitivity in the time dimension by saying
> there may even be cases where you would want to filter differently
> depending on the path and which commit the blob appears, which is even
> worse) filtering be best left to the tree or index filter?
What I really want is the equivalent of "dos2unix --recursive *.c
*.txt etc" for all commits.
Theoretically, a .txt file might be renamed to a .jpg file, in which
case funny things would happen with such a filter, depending which
commit was seen first.
I'm pretty confident that this will never happen to me, but it's a
valid concern.
Have fun,
Avery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-23 23:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-21 19:48 Git on Windows, CRLF issues Peter Karlsson
2008-04-21 20:07 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-04-21 21:53 ` Avery Pennarun
2008-04-22 2:39 ` Jeff King
2008-04-22 16:51 ` Avery Pennarun
2008-04-23 7:11 ` Peter Karlsson
2008-04-23 8:10 ` Jeff King
2008-04-23 13:47 ` Peter Karlsson
2008-04-23 14:24 ` Johan Herland
2008-04-23 15:12 ` Johannes Sixt
2008-04-23 8:08 ` Jeff King
2008-04-23 10:13 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-04-23 10:58 ` Jeff King
2008-04-23 10:58 ` Johannes Sixt
2008-04-23 11:04 ` Jeff King
2008-04-23 11:46 ` Johannes Sixt
2008-04-23 21:47 ` Jeff King
2008-04-23 23:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-04-23 23:04 ` Avery Pennarun [this message]
2008-04-24 8:11 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-04-24 16:56 ` Avery Pennarun
2008-04-24 1:37 ` Jeff King
2008-04-23 20:02 ` Avery Pennarun
2008-04-24 6:25 ` Johannes Sixt
2008-04-22 6:41 ` Johannes Sixt
2008-04-21 21:51 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-04-22 6:52 ` Peter Karlsson
2008-04-22 9:04 ` Johannes Sixt
2008-04-22 6:31 ` Johannes Sixt
2008-04-22 8:42 ` Peter Karlsson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=32541b130804231604r4c439fa5va5c01bfd53a22cc7@mail.gmail.com \
--to=apenwarr@gmail.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=peter@softwolves.pp.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).