Re: git-gc doesn't clean up leftover objects after git-filter-branch unless you clone first

["Avery Pennarun" <apenwarr@gmail.com>]

On 4/23/08, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
>  +
>  +Notes
>  +-----
>  +
>  +git-gc tries very hard to be safe about the garbage it collects. In
>  +particular, it will keep not only objects referenced by your current set
>  +of branches and tags, but also objects referenced by the index, remote
>  +tracking branches, refs saved by linkgit:git-filter-branch[1] in
>  +refs/original/, or reflogs (which may references commits in branches
>  +that were later amended or rewound).
>  +
>  +If you are expecting some objects to be collected and it isn't, check
>  +all of those locations and decide whether it makes sense in your case to
>  +remove those references.
>  +

This information would have helped me quite a bit when I first
encountered this problem.  It would be nice if it also showed up under
git-prune (since git-gc doesn't delete anything itself, if I
understand correctly).  Also a link to some information about reflogs
(even just to "see also" git-reflog) would help, since I didn't hear
about reflogs at all until after I joined the mailing list.

Avery