From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Avery Pennarun" Subject: Re: git-gc doesn't clean up leftover objects after git-filter-branch unless you clone first Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:59:34 -0400 Message-ID: <32541b130804240959y3b05d4b5u67ac7a7c14bf187e@mail.gmail.com> References: <32541b130804230841h32c07f3arc94cccfaf0b156a3@mail.gmail.com> <7vve28sdys.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080423221316.GE30057@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20080424012836.GA30812@sigill.intra.peff.net> <32541b130804240843k471ecfeteb1008c44a56808b@mail.gmail.com> <20080424161407.GA23737@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Git Mailing List" To: "Jeff King" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Apr 24 19:00:57 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jp4o4-0001oA-0N for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 19:00:24 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753966AbYDXQ7h (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:59:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751753AbYDXQ7h (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:59:37 -0400 Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.128.190]:20934 "EHLO fk-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751187AbYDXQ7g (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:59:36 -0400 Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 19so4483758fkr.5 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:59:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=LfvYQQmi7YEn+/a2JxIBikqD310oQfIh2ZaAGqLjnm8=; b=U1dP+kZ0cr2KTirFJMpxXCGJCj6UoxDxpyYzjsbvg/EERETSWA/Y0jEC2Jwtwn0NM6VgUF0Z/os3WWPWaQHOtwzhJklDBtrjigM73CSf6zSCrhBPLxGgOryz/NbUl07Vo2Wr8yGydpabgzdKlGrq4Q6apVxk77zqvZcHly+82YY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=TK/JAS+biaB6cy7ahlg/entmCm8FPOp+fdz3cawGFVW14RftZS8q3tL718iDVR4PBMqmRQIklfixp8l+xrSSHiWvMfdLkoAaoTainCpZybpPLPzi/OxGAXWigH6d/mpFPHCXqrZcv5IQvLmj8z7zuqsuaKorWY5DtvT1s2mfEm8= Received: by 10.82.166.9 with SMTP id o9mr2639869bue.11.1209056374629; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:59:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.166.12 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:59:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20080424161407.GA23737@sigill.intra.peff.net> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 4/24/08, Jeff King wrote: > Hmm, maybe it would make sense to put that note in git-prune, with a > note in git-gc to look at the prune page. Perhaps. > But if the note were moved to git-prune, it would be natural to mention > git-reflog there. What do you think? I gather there's a movement in recent git versions (sorry, I only tuned in recently) to encourage people to use git-gc instead of git-prune in almost all cases. The reasons I ever looked at git-prune at all was that git-gc mentioned it in "See Also", and because "git-prune" sounded more obviously like what I wanted than "git-gc" when I looked at "man git". Adding git-gc *and* git-reflog as See Also entries in git-prune would make sense to me. Avery