From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Avery Pennarun" Subject: Re: [PATCH] better git-submodule status output Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 14:29:30 -0400 Message-ID: <32541b130807071129m218059eaw8837681c0d705cd@mail.gmail.com> References: <20080701150119.GE5852@joyeux> <20080706160758.GA23385@jhaampe.org> <20080707062142.GA5506@jhaampe.org> <32541b130807070725p6fa4d0dfne9f04bc857920dc7@mail.gmail.com> <20080707145726.GI3696@joyeux> <7v8wwd4kvb.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Sylvain Joyeux" , "Johannes Schindelin" , "Lars Hjemli" , "Ping Yin" , "Mark Levedahl" , git@vger.kernel.org To: "Junio C Hamano" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jul 07 20:30:36 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KFvTp-0003RC-NF for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:30:30 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753686AbYGGS3c (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2008 14:29:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754138AbYGGS3c (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2008 14:29:32 -0400 Received: from el-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.162.183]:3717 "EHLO el-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753623AbYGGS3b (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2008 14:29:31 -0400 Received: by el-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id z25so216306ele.1 for ; Mon, 07 Jul 2008 11:29:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=TlGiDIH+VmIy3k+6uCFCvB5sSPWAX/7vrrwx0oWvVms=; b=MouJ/zjFlmW3loq97De0rZJ2skbhrGmBMVRO5kKYge1uKKG3yU2uN8fn5fzEHEXiNX UY1wtES2tYCh8H16JRpNGifKFOIsUx2nk6wrRQQfi0M9Gv6Z7Iz36luP7EnAXa4Jsi7X MSafTcz3KxsV8n7Ir0vJgytqKMzXLat8fV8rY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=pqwQh/LCbdPIZ091OmrCPrujCIEQKvyyFk3xcL7+bKnmrWjDWa3pEFyymdF/e3PaQ9 lPKJYZupKPfTDp/xEvFI2+iOK0QGnGQU8VIHRaYHL5rvshuI49R1Rws4zlWBHtQIhSk0 q3b0H3tqreK/Mjnf/vYONrlHLH7MrdeJkdQBU= Received: by 10.150.54.6 with SMTP id c6mr1685173yba.207.1215455370537; Mon, 07 Jul 2008 11:29:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.98.19 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 11:29:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7v8wwd4kvb.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 7/7/08, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Sylvain Joyeux writes: > > Is it possible to make 'fetch' only .. well .. fetch objects, without > > updating any refs? > > Not very easily, and that is very deliberate. The objects fetched will > become dangling if you allowed such a mode of operation, and will > immediately become subject to gc. Is this really desirable? I could imagine dropping an entry (or several entries, or whatever) into the reflog after each fetch, to prevent such fetched objects from being deleted right away. Avery