From: "Avery Pennarun" <apenwarr@gmail.com>
To: "Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy" <pclouds@gmail.com>
Cc: "Jakub Narebski" <jnareb@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org,
"Johannes Schindelin" <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/12] Sparse checkout
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:53:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <32541b130807250753j1071639ao9313a8acad9f4183@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fcaeb9bf0807241621y60b0341ej8f9f3b591ef12baf@mail.gmail.com>
On 7/24/08, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> wrote:
> I wrote that with svn repos in mind. If those repos are to be
> partially checked out, .svnignore would be in subdirectories rather
> than at toplevel. Anyway that may not be true.
As far as I know, this is a misstatement of how svn works. It uses
svn:ignore properties, not .svnignore files, and they don't apply
recursively, so this potential inconsistency wouldn't happen with svn.
Of course, in the name of this consistency, svn gave up recursive
ignores.
So anyway, back on topic, the definition of a "well-organized
repository" is different wth git than with svn for this reason. I
would certainly expect most well-organized git repositories to have a
toplevel .gitignore for the most common stuff.
Have fun,
Avery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-25 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-23 14:55 [RFC PATCH 00/12] Sparse checkout Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2008-07-23 15:38 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2008-07-23 16:15 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-23 16:21 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2008-07-23 16:55 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-24 8:27 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2008-07-24 12:42 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-24 13:29 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2008-07-24 13:44 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-24 13:50 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2008-07-24 16:22 ` Avery Pennarun
2008-07-24 16:38 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-24 18:59 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2008-08-03 18:37 ` Jan Hudec
2008-08-03 20:48 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-08-04 12:29 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2008-07-24 8:24 ` James Pickens
2008-07-24 9:00 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2008-07-24 17:59 ` James Pickens
2008-07-24 23:23 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2008-07-24 23:38 ` James Pickens
2008-07-24 9:35 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-07-24 10:58 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2008-07-24 20:01 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-07-24 23:21 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2008-07-25 14:53 ` Avery Pennarun [this message]
2008-07-25 0:07 ` Johannes Schindelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=32541b130807250753j1071639ao9313a8acad9f4183@mail.gmail.com \
--to=apenwarr@gmail.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).