From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Avery Pennarun" Subject: Re: Suggestion: "man git clone" Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:07:14 -0400 Message-ID: <32541b130808211007xf295e40l567ecf785a8fca22@mail.gmail.com> References: <48ACB29C.7000606@zytor.com> <48ACB5F4.3000905@sneakemail.com> <48AD99DF.5090802@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?\"Peter_Valdemar_M=F8rch_(Lists)\"?=" <4ux6as402@sneakemail.com>, flucifredi@acm.org, "Git ML" To: "H. Peter Anvin" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Aug 21 19:09:52 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KWDe5-0001a4-SW for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 19:08:26 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752085AbYHURHR (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:07:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751837AbYHURHR (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:07:17 -0400 Received: from mail-gx0-f16.google.com ([209.85.217.16]:56296 "EHLO mail-gx0-f16.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751500AbYHURHQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:07:16 -0400 Received: by gxk9 with SMTP id 9so349260gxk.13 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 10:07:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=jnwCVcDL2Z38Z91gicBJAva6roWve0f5w2hA2eGex3I=; b=woOcO6Idkd3u/5afW+D5UA2GarKobP8dUWo6E2c1hYN5uiZgh7QFjxdgjUNA8R/OL4 rzX8G4TxAGVjdHEV/7dElxPrCsRMIXQAzGPEUuTBB/dXwRvIqM5R3CVoLqGBP5To9A9T yEYWMI1PXCRxHXN5TBku6pytNvb0APRfOsz4E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=scpCJeVf1PmVl9Jup33/VxkpThvmKf4duPjz6Y/EwqsN30Y45i9nTEZb4owVL6BACo yhwhmko96BjlPR4yzNd6fuBmnW7BIbU9nMi+X04qcvy/anxTOOUyPKU/YlgcMM8ETK69 SLUCKbv0wGQ5Fg7emvXbueGsWANQfShjUot/w= Received: by 10.150.181.11 with SMTP id d11mr80358ybf.217.1219338434199; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 10:07:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.98.19 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 10:07:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <48AD99DF.5090802@zytor.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 12:37 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > man git clone > > [...] > > I doubt you find *anyone* who relies on the current behaviour, so I am > suggesting changing man. That's why the man author was on the recipient > list, but you removed it. > [and I put him back...] Unfortunately what we don't have is a proposal that would work better. Also, changing the behaviour of 'man' wouldn't work on any platform other than Linux (presumably), which means the git documentation wouldn't be able to rely on that behaviour. Still, in a perfect world, what *should* man do in such a case? Automatically open /usr/man/man1/git/clone.1? Thanks, Avery