From: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>,
git@vger.kernel.org, markus.heidelberg@web.de,
Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Subject: Re: git submodule update --merge
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 15:04:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <32541b130905251204q20b5600fr4486390cc9157f66@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0905252053070.4288@intel-tinevez-2-302>
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Johannes Schindelin
<Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> Because in the project I use submodules most heavily, there is one
> recurring theme: you cannot push to the submodules. And by "you" I mean
> "a regular user".
>
> So virtually all you do in these submodules cannot be pushed at all. It
> has to be submitted to the respective submodule maintainer.
>
> And guess what happens in such a case when you set that tentative "update"
> variable to "merge"?
>
> Exactly.
>
> FWIW I consider any scenario where the average users have push access to
> the submodule a toy scenario.
I have the same problem. Out of curiosity, how do you handle the case
where you really need to make a change to the submodule and let your
team members see that change, even though the submodule's upstream is
slow and/or doesn't accept the patch?
In that situation, we've had to make local shared mirrors of all the
submodules and point .gitmodules at that. But that would be your
"toy" scenario - our local users have push access to the submodule.
Thanks,
Avery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-25 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-17 8:05 What's cooking in git.git (May 2009, #02; Sun, 17) Junio C Hamano
2009-05-17 9:45 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-05-17 17:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-05-17 18:27 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-05-17 11:41 ` David Aguilar
2009-05-18 13:36 ` Johan Herland
2009-05-18 19:40 ` Markus Heidelberg
2009-05-18 21:55 ` Johan Herland
2009-05-19 0:35 ` [PATCH] git-submodule: add support for --merge Johan Herland
2009-05-19 1:33 ` What's cooking in git.git (May 2009, #02; Sun, 17) Junio C Hamano
2009-05-19 7:23 ` Johan Herland
2009-05-19 8:17 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-05-19 8:45 ` Johan Herland
2009-05-19 11:53 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-05-19 13:26 ` git submodule update --merge (Was: What's cooking in git.git (May 2009, #02; Sun, 17)) Johan Herland
2009-05-25 11:59 ` Johan Herland
2009-05-25 18:33 ` git submodule update --merge Junio C Hamano
2009-05-25 18:57 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-05-25 19:04 ` Avery Pennarun [this message]
2009-05-25 19:54 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-05-25 22:48 ` Johan Herland
2009-05-25 22:10 ` Johan Herland
2009-05-25 23:15 ` git submodule update --merge (Was: What's cooking in git.git (May 2009, #02; Sun, 17)) Peter Hutterer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=32541b130905251204q20b5600fr4486390cc9157f66@mail.gmail.com \
--to=apenwarr@gmail.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=johan@herland.net \
--cc=markus.heidelberg@web.de \
--cc=peter.hutterer@who-t.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).