From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avery Pennarun Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix overridable written with an extra 'e' Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:15:29 +0000 Message-ID: <32541b130908280815y78f95140re679c336fbd17443@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090828121849.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> <20090828034305.GQ4297@inocybe.localdomain> <7v63c8a69a.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Todd Zullinger , Nanako Shiraishi , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Aug 28 17:16:20 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Mh3Ba-0007Ce-LJ for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:16:19 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752100AbZH1PPs convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:15:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752425AbZH1PPs (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:15:48 -0400 Received: from mail-gx0-f205.google.com ([209.85.217.205]:48688 "EHLO mail-gx0-f205.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752415AbZH1PPr convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:15:47 -0400 Received: by gxk1 with SMTP id 1so2499628gxk.17 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 08:15:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Qr6mqrQQKV9ui4PRCpZ+3KvAJ4NwhGAQsPaTMB9eGFY=; b=pxwb4AwBOip4ZgQWbCi/3fzNfT1TpkvDMTcfof9mnyjrQubPnKhZp0plrYq5mJ4YWQ IYbNuYQQHsOBJn+g4EI6CIbZ8zRagXiGNqNN+j1Ag8nm9rYCvEs6q+vh6WHl8louCeuT FlvL8RBYXa4gJMFB8CmN/1eg4Knlqk85fREk4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=vDrdOcf0pgkeyweW1bl+T7JGTcxU2l1s4Nx3hHwz5DzKzDP2pkwnAnvoRu8REQXTEs VUcekZyNJMTeSw/rWX1Nvwcvg+rTahjBOqmqKa5N6frL0eAg4X+MHtKijwnPCKTLHmgg KWp+2dQ5mHxx0FykeTSSwEuKmPooErERKQCfY= Received: by 10.150.8.14 with SMTP id 14mr2416369ybh.52.1251472549058; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 08:15:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7v63c8a69a.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:53 AM, Junio C Hamano wrot= e: > Hmph, I don't know. =A0Googling "overrideable" suggests "Did you mean > overridable?" which is enough clue for me. Using a similar system, the Google hit count: overrideable: 26,900 overridable: 339,000 overridden: 2,280,000 Which agrees with my intuition that you can get away with overridable, but it's much more common to just use overridden. "override" of course comes from "ride" (181,000,000). A horse can be ridden (10,500,000) if it's ridable (82,500). The bad news: rideable (201,000). http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ridable shows rideable as the preferred spelling, but accepts both. Have fun, Avery