git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>
To: "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
	Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>,
	Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@hvoigt.net>, Lars Hjemli <hjemli@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: submodules' shortcomings, was Re: RFC: display dirty submodule  working directory in git gui and gitk
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 17:35:39 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <32541b131001041435t7373990dxcab10a2d8aa346d8@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100104222701.GE22872@spearce.org>

On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
>> Besides, as long as there is enough reason to have out-of-Git alternative
>> solutions such as repo, submodules deserve to be 2nd-class citizens.
>
> If I didn't think I'd be shot by current submodule users, I'd offer
> to write a full replacement based around the current in repository
> format, but with sane features like we have in repo.

Perhaps write it and call it 'git sub' or something.  Put them both
in, and let users decide which they want to use.  Or, like git
subtree, maintain it separately.

Personally, I've avoided tools like repo because they seem to try to
kidnap my *entire* git experience, most of which is already fine.
It's just submodules that are crazy.  I think it's probably similar
for other people.

Avery

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-04 22:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-02 15:33 RFC: display dirty submodule working directory in git gui and gitk Jens Lehmann
2010-01-04  9:44 ` Johannes Schindelin
2010-01-04 10:44   ` Heiko Voigt
2010-01-04 11:46     ` submodules, was " Johannes Schindelin
2010-01-04 18:29       ` Avery Pennarun
2010-01-04 19:14         ` Jens Lehmann
2010-01-04 17:04   ` Jens Lehmann
2010-01-04 22:29     ` submodules' shortcomings, was " Johannes Schindelin
2010-01-04 22:27       ` Shawn O. Pearce
2010-01-04 22:35         ` Avery Pennarun [this message]
2010-01-04 22:53       ` Avery Pennarun
2010-01-05  8:11       ` Jens Lehmann
2010-01-05  9:33         ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-05 10:07           ` Johannes Schindelin
2010-01-05 11:57           ` Jens Lehmann
2010-01-05 18:31             ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-05 20:01               ` Jens Lehmann
2010-01-06  1:04                 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-06 14:05                   ` Jens Lehmann
2010-01-06 17:01                     ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-06 17:23                       ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2010-01-06 17:55                         ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-06 18:22                           ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2010-01-06 18:32                           ` Jens Lehmann
2010-01-06 20:01                             ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-06 21:19                               ` Jens Lehmann
2010-01-06 18:20                       ` Jens Lehmann
2010-01-05 23:02               ` Johannes Schindelin
2010-01-05  9:46         ` Johannes Schindelin
2010-01-05 12:19           ` Jens Lehmann
2010-01-05 14:27           ` Heiko Voigt
2010-01-05 15:07             ` Johan Herland
2010-01-05 15:30             ` Johannes Schindelin
2010-01-05 22:37             ` Nanako Shiraishi
2010-01-05 23:13               ` Johannes Schindelin
2010-01-07 11:04                 ` Nanako Shiraishi
2010-01-05 20:38       ` Pau Garcia i Quiles
2010-01-05 23:06         ` cmake, was Re: submodules' shortcomings Johannes Schindelin
2010-01-06  1:17           ` Pau Garcia i Quiles
2010-01-06  4:25             ` Miles Bader
2010-01-06  9:24             ` Johannes Schindelin
2010-01-04 17:51   ` RFC: display dirty submodule working directory in git gui and gitk Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2010-01-04 18:40     ` Jens Lehmann
2010-01-04 19:05       ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-04 19:21         ` Jens Lehmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=32541b131001041435t7373990dxcab10a2d8aa346d8@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=apenwarr@gmail.com \
    --cc=Jens.Lehmann@web.de \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=hjemli@gmail.com \
    --cc=hvoigt@hvoigt.net \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=spearce@spearce.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).