Re: Repository cloned using SSH does not respect bare repository initial branch

[Sheik <sahibzone@gmail.com>]

On 30/10/23 20:36, Jeff King wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 07:36:36AM +1100, Sheik wrote:
>
>> Repository cloned using SSH does not use the branch configured in the bare
>> repository however repository cloned using filesystem does as expected.
>> Shouldn't they both behave the same?
> What version of Git is running on the ssh server?
>
> Your example seems to show that the parent repository has an unborn
> branch (i.e., HEAD points to "refs/heads/test", but there are no commits
> yet). I think the server-side bits you need for that to work showed up
> in 59e1205d16 (ls-refs: report unborn targets of symrefs, 2021-02-05),
> which is in v2.31.
>
> So even though your client seems to be v2.42 (from the output you gave),
> if the server is older it may not be sending sufficient information.
> There were also some other fixes on top of that, but I _think_ they were
> all client-side (so your v2.42 clone command should be doing the right
> thing).
>
> -Peff


Confirming your observation above, yes this is a purely new bare 
repository which has no commits yet before cloning.


Thanks

Sheik