Re: [PATCH] t-example-decorate: remove test messages

["René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>]

Am 31.07.24 um 03:41 schrieb Ghanshyam Thakkar:
>
> If we want to further simplify, I don't see any need for having 'ret'
> either and to just call the methods in check():
>
>     check(add_decoration(&vars->n, vars->two, NULL), ==, NULL);
>
> which would also provide more context in the stdout rather than printing
> 'check(ret == NULL)'. But, I believe you would have already considered
> that but kept 'ret' in favor of code readability, so I am also fine with
> it. Thanks for patch.

Good idea!  Worth a separate patch, though.

René