From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brian Gernhardt Subject: Re: Inconsistencies with git log Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 19:52:12 -0500 Message-ID: <3F3DD397-AD37-4D51-8531-A76E320C188D@silverinsanity.com> References: <9e4733910711071415i1729e277u6be19b72cd682a85@mail.gmail.com> <9e4733910711071445p7cfb6cffx83adb1d84d6bf9d8@mail.gmail.com> <9e4733910711071503va92a653s25fd978989d5917d@mail.gmail.com> <243E1E6E-4723-42D3-933C-D2A0D1ACE287@silverinsanity.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v912) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Johannes Schindelin" , "Jon Smirl" , "Git Mailing List" To: David Symonds X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Nov 08 01:52:34 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IpvdJ-0004tK-34 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 08 Nov 2007 01:52:33 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754123AbXKHAwS (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2007 19:52:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754096AbXKHAwR (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2007 19:52:17 -0500 Received: from vs072.rosehosting.com ([216.114.78.72]:40995 "EHLO silverinsanity.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753631AbXKHAwR (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2007 19:52:17 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.5] (cpe-69-205-115-17.rochester.res.rr.com [69.205.115.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by silverinsanity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B2891FFC10F; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 00:52:15 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.912) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Nov 7, 2007, at 7:14 PM, David Symonds wrote: > On Nov 8, 2007 11:09 AM, Johannes Schindelin > wrote: >> Too late ;-) > > I see that you're revolting against relative paths in git-log; I agree > with you on that. I'm proposing changing the output to git-status so > that it produces relative paths Johannes was referring to the fact that he already produced that patches for it. :-) ~~ Brian