From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Aghiles Subject: Re: git pull opinion Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 23:22:33 -0500 Message-ID: <3abd05a90711052022j590f1faesb85f4646afd9acec@mail.gmail.com> References: <3abd05a90711051352t2f6be00bsa862585abd370fb1@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Jakub Narebski" , git@vger.kernel.org To: "Johannes Schindelin" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Nov 06 05:22:53 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IpFxk-0001Yn-Bi for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 05:22:52 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755028AbXKFEWg (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Nov 2007 23:22:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754802AbXKFEWg (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Nov 2007 23:22:36 -0500 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.187]:61113 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754513AbXKFEWf (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Nov 2007 23:22:35 -0500 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g13so1574562nfb for ; Mon, 05 Nov 2007 20:22:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=MLHxxSCAwLVVlKAGE/VQx4t56iMsh68lZ4KQyy/dP+U=; b=j1HfqnXr6efSIXKr7LUq1zOxJkhx5IN/VrxLbk0F+Eo4n94qpjpFZDcHznYAfGCuB3i4wKNWT4rzOyRUnQoaDl0sutPguhSc7tMoIcHzbgwDAAcyFdAB1FNno1hOBteDgmyw4zDtA2ZiAORZaJzFINpKGkLGUJKdmfdUnfePWAo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=np+GhYPHmWLNU9a80CY6GN2R3VVGmkmjzdvFOZX6oPIilIWvL3NZI2N2J8j9CX0WFd3ivoNrxgj/p6eFFm/wBvprohpoTnWOnlqXwfbYUG4PI2BvLcZJ/t/GiU9dMtRiCk0GkpzqnShsHz8JxOv9K87XsdJn+NBSzz64x9VTVPs= Received: by 10.78.132.2 with SMTP id f2mr4415320hud.1194322953405; Mon, 05 Nov 2007 20:22:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.185.1 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Nov 2007 20:22:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hello, > The consense was that you are much better off committing first, then > pulling. And if the work you are doing really is not committable, but you > _have_ to pull _now_, you use stash. Although you are quite likely to > revert the pull when it succeeds, and _then_ unstash. Sorry but I don't really understand why one should "revert the pull" ? Could elaborate for a newbie ? :) - Aghiles.