From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hin-Tak Leung Subject: Re: git svn's performance on cloning mono's branches/tags... Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 04:08:01 +0100 Message-ID: <3ace41890906272008t96bfb04q7218e95055897900@mail.gmail.com> References: <3ace41890906251739r45b3eae9oe1b7e32886defc0f@mail.gmail.com> <4A445959.6090403@op5.se> <3ace41890906260259o3be005fq6be9d0e2c3f9af66@mail.gmail.com> <4A44A9A9.6030008@op5.se> <3ace41890906260644t3eddb2d2sb4ddbcb6499801@mail.gmail.com> <3ace41890906261817y523c9321xd621fb3130941d91@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Andreas Ericsson X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jun 28 05:08:14 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MKkkY-0003qi-0n for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 28 Jun 2009 05:08:14 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752262AbZF1DIB (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Jun 2009 23:08:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752094AbZF1DIA (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Jun 2009 23:08:00 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f210.google.com ([209.85.219.210]:62096 "EHLO mail-ew0-f210.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751836AbZF1DH7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Jun 2009 23:07:59 -0400 Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so4584143ewy.37 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 20:08:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=b09fR7cmJbGQ+gViLZ1hPV5riUOQagiVndmy8ESAkuU=; b=I90RuntjsCLXTbQDMO/wObvV7vFWyI++OSs6HzSlFbOt4fBt+K3ceU03Po3dsvhFkP gsnYcEau3VaCgfUgB745zCcAFDbRnnn16phKuj3ND/k9R3C28leCrSpBCmNohvZSEzbl aHSmkXrcX94mstaehqyBgXrAoF1itf42ACyNI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=HMooDZob9tb7TBdlfh+Sm44wqjq2zLhGx0lXdJ4A+dX3FEBonmVr0E/3ImRsZzjjT0 h0aM+64aTGA3b/oCW5x3CnoP/opwm6nr+N6+aWvh19TGU0rUfhtd6PKIa3QjgaGO0bRZ pp/NPEEYRycQ8wcJydWxWEwQcILCH9hwXTYS0= Received: by 10.216.13.209 with SMTP id b59mr1634945web.44.1246158481474; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 20:08:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3ace41890906261817y523c9321xd621fb3130941d91@mail.gmail.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 2:17 AM, Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > the tags, branches, url entries are effectively the same, I think - so > the main difference is using trunk instead of fetch. > Why does it make any difference? The example at the bottom of > git-svn's man page uses the trunk notation. Maybe it should be > changed? > To answer my question - I think the man page should be updated. Also, while searching 'git svn speed', I found that a git clone of mono is available: http://www.mono-project.com/GitSVN A shame this page is not referenced my other devel resources on mono's web site at all... also it uses a real user's account to make the clone (rather than annonymous svn), so to update the git clone by git-svn, one needs a real dev account - that is not a problem for the purpose of sending in patches as the occasional dev.