From: Mark Levedahl <mlevedahl@gmail.com>
To: Shroom Moo <egg_mushroomcow@foxmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: j6t@kdbg.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] git-gui: handle missing worktree and separated gitdir
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 12:18:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3b0b37ed-1a5d-4fe1-b2b4-7db67a62a06d@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tencent_8A236D9D4A8D8CCA7DAA083157AA8543700A@qq.com>
On 4/30/26 6:02 AM, Shroom Moo wrote:
> When git-gui is started from a directory that Git recognizes as a
> valid repository but the working tree is not accessible (e.g., a
> separated gitdir created by `git clone --separate-git-dir`, a bare
> repository, or a case where the worktree directory was removed),
> it previously called `rev-parse --show-toplevel` without error
> handling, causing a fatal Tcl error ("this operation must be run
> in a work tree").
>
> Wrap the call in a `catch` and handle the failure as follows:
>
> - For bare repositories, keep `_gitworktree` empty so that the
> existing `is_bare` check shows "Cannot use bare repository" and
> exits. No behavioral change.
>
> - For non‑bare repositories, try to locate the worktree from the
> parent directory using `git -C $parent rev-parse --show-toplevel`.
> If the parent is a valid worktree, change to it; this covers the
> legitimate case of starting git-gui from within the .git
> subdirectory of a normal working tree.
>
> - If the parent directory is not a worktree, refuse to start with
> a clear error message. This prevents dangerous operations in a
> separated gitdir, where ordinary Git commands like `git status`
> would themselves refuse to run.
>
> The approach intentionally avoids two pitfalls:
>
> - Testing `--is-inside-git-dir` before calling `--show-toplevel`
> would break the normal use case of starting git-gui from within
> a .git subdirectory (where --show-toplevel would succeed).
>
> - A simple “non‑bare” check after a failed --show-toplevel would
> reject a normal repository whose worktree was only temporarily
> removed.
>
> The chosen method keeps the original behavior for bare repositories
> and for regular working trees, fixes the crash, and properly blocks
> separated gitdirs without a reachable worktree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shroom Moo <egg_mushroomcow@foxmail.com>
> ---
> git-gui/git-gui.sh | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/git-gui/git-gui.sh b/git-gui/git-gui.sh
> index 23fe76e498..2392282df3 100755
> --- a/git-gui/git-gui.sh
> +++ b/git-gui/git-gui.sh
> @@ -1169,7 +1169,28 @@ if {![file isdirectory $_gitdir]} {
> load_config 0
> apply_config
>
> -set _gitworktree [git rev-parse --show-toplevel]
> +if {[catch {set _gitworktree [git rev-parse --show-toplevel]}]} {
> + # For bare repositories, use the existing error handling
> + if {![catch {set bare [git rev-parse --is-bare-repository]}] && $bare eq {true}} {
> + set _gitworktree {}
> + } else {
> + # Non-bare: try to find the worktree from the parent directory
> + set parent [file dirname [pwd]]
> + # Cannot go higher than the root directory; leave _gitworktree empty
> + if {[file normalize $parent] eq [file normalize [pwd]]} {
> + # Already at the filesystem root; let existing paths cope
> + set _gitworktree {}
> + } elseif {![catch {
> + set _gitworktree [git -C $parent rev-parse --show-toplevel]
> + }]} {
> + cd $parent
> + } else {
> + catch {wm withdraw .}
> + error_popup [mc "Cannot start git-gui from inside the Git directory."]
> + exit 1
> + }
> + }
> +}
>
> if {$_prefix ne {}} {
> if {$_gitworktree eq {}} {
A bare repository can be contained in a workdir / worktree pointing at a different gitdir:
the logic above can thus a workdir that doesn't use the gitdir where git-gui was started.
The bigger issue is that a gitdir can support multiple checked-out directories with no
one-to-one mapping and no clear idea of which of those a user may have intended.
So, I believe the correct fix is to test "rev-parse --is-inside-git-dir, and if so throw a
clear error message and exit. This will give the user something to start with to solve the
problem of why they started git-gui in a gitdir, and not in a worktree.
Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-30 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-21 16:28 [PATCH] git-gui: handle bare repo or missing worktree Shroom Moo
2026-04-29 6:58 ` Johannes Sixt
2026-04-29 17:32 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] git-gui: protect rev-parse --show-toplevel call Shroom Moo
2026-04-29 20:14 ` Mark Levedahl
2026-04-30 10:02 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] git-gui: handle missing worktree and separated gitdir Shroom Moo
2026-04-30 16:18 ` Mark Levedahl [this message]
2026-05-01 10:22 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] git-gui: handle missing worktree and separated Shroom Moo
2026-05-01 13:13 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] git-gui: handle missing worktree and separated gitdir Johannes Sixt
2026-05-01 16:42 ` Mark Levedahl
2026-05-02 21:51 ` Mark Levedahl
2026-05-03 8:53 ` Johannes Sixt
2026-05-04 15:13 ` Mark Levedahl
2026-05-05 3:40 ` Mark Levedahl
2026-05-06 7:32 ` Johannes Sixt
2026-05-06 11:27 ` Mark Levedahl
2026-05-06 12:57 ` Johannes Sixt
2026-05-06 14:05 ` Mark Levedahl
2026-05-07 5:09 ` Mark Levedahl
2026-05-01 10:54 ` [PATCH v4 " Shroom Moo
2026-05-04 14:59 ` [PATCH v5 1/1] git-gui: restructure repository startup Shroom Moo
2026-05-06 7:15 ` Johannes Sixt
2026-05-06 20:27 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] git-gui: robustify startup and fix environment handling Shroom Moo
2026-05-09 13:37 ` [PATCH v7 " Shroom Moo
2026-05-14 14:28 ` Mark Levedahl
2026-05-14 14:33 ` [PATCH v1 00/11] Improve git gui operation without a worktree Mark Levedahl
2026-05-14 14:33 ` [PATCH v1 01/11] git-gui: allow specifying path '.' to the browser Mark Levedahl
2026-05-15 15:54 ` Johannes Sixt
2026-05-14 14:33 ` [PATCH v1 02/11] git-gui: refactor browser / blame argument parsing Mark Levedahl
2026-05-15 15:56 ` Johannes Sixt
2026-05-14 14:33 ` [PATCH v1 03/11] git-gui: guard set/unset of GIT_DIR and GIT_WORK_TREE Mark Levedahl
2026-05-15 15:58 ` Johannes Sixt
2026-05-14 14:33 ` [PATCH v1 04/11] git-gui: put choose_repository::pick in a proc Mark Levedahl
2026-05-15 11:00 ` Aina Boot
2026-05-15 13:33 ` Mark Levedahl
2026-05-15 15:59 ` Johannes Sixt
2026-05-14 14:33 ` [PATCH v1 05/11] git-gui: use --absolute-git-dir Mark Levedahl
2026-05-15 16:00 ` Johannes Sixt
2026-05-14 14:33 ` [PATCH v1 06/11] git gui: GIT_DIR / GIT_WORK_TREE make any discovery error fatal Mark Levedahl
2026-05-14 14:33 ` [PATCH v1 07/11] git-gui: use rev-parse exclusively to find a repository Mark Levedahl
2026-05-15 16:06 ` Johannes Sixt
2026-05-14 14:33 ` [PATCH v1 08/11] git-gui: simplify [is_bare] to report if a worktree is known Mark Levedahl
2026-05-14 14:33 ` [PATCH v1 09/11] git-gui: support using repository parent dir as a worktree Mark Levedahl
2026-05-14 14:33 ` [PATCH v1 10/11] git-gui: improve worktree discovery Mark Levedahl
2026-05-14 14:33 ` [PATCH v1 11/11] git-gui: add gui and pick as explicit subcommands Mark Levedahl
[not found] ` <20260509133756.1367-1-egg_mushroomcow@foxmail.com>
2026-05-09 13:37 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] git-gui: restructure repository startup Shroom Moo
2026-05-15 8:26 ` Johannes Sixt
2026-05-09 13:37 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] git-gui: disable gitk visualization when no worktree available Shroom Moo
2026-05-15 8:28 ` Johannes Sixt
2026-05-09 13:37 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] git-gui: handle GIT_DIR and GIT_WORK_TREE early Shroom Moo
2026-05-15 8:28 ` Johannes Sixt
[not found] ` <20260506202751.3294-1-egg_mushroomcow@foxmail.com>
2026-05-06 20:27 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] git-gui: restructure repository startup Shroom Moo
2026-05-06 20:27 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] git-gui: disable gitk visualization when no worktree available Shroom Moo
2026-05-06 20:27 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] git-gui: handle GIT_DIR and GIT_WORK_TREE early Shroom Moo
2026-05-07 15:50 ` Mark Levedahl
2026-05-09 8:46 ` Aina Boot
2026-05-09 9:55 ` Shroom Moo
2026-04-29 18:28 ` [PATCH] git-gui: handle bare repo or missing worktree Shroom Moo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3b0b37ed-1a5d-4fe1-b2b4-7db67a62a06d@gmail.com \
--to=mlevedahl@gmail.com \
--cc=egg_mushroomcow@foxmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox