From: Matt Schoen <mtschoen@gmail.com>
To: Eugene Sajine <euguess@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: get git not to care about permissions
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:47:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3cf217d80911120747k116d3747g75dc60f17e00127@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <76c5b8580911120728j2f9995basb554b0a493a364bf@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks for the tip, Eugene, but I'm not sure if this helps me.
I'm trying to set up the repo on a shared directory, which isn't
actually on a physical computer (NetApp is basically a
data-server-in-a-box, and as such I do not directly interface with
it). Thus, I must access the directory over the school network, which
uses Kerberos security. I think it is this restriction that is giving
git its issues.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Eugene Sajine <euguess@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Nov 9, 2009 11:06 AM, "sconeman" <schoen@bu.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to set up git on a NetApp drive at my school, BU. The NetApp
>>> shares are configured with Windows permissions, and I forget the specifics
>>> (which I can figure out if needed) about why this is the case, but basically
>>> the deal is that if true UNIX permissions were to be used, Windows wouldn't
>>> be able to read the drive. As such, and because we use the Kerberos
>>> ticketing system, the permissions for the drive are set up such that the
>>> owners (myself and my team members) have full permissions, but nobody else
>>> does. Git doesn't like this and won't even create a bare repository. Is
>>> there any way I can get git to ignore permissions and just do what it needs
>>> to do?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance for the help!
>>>
>>> -Matt
>> --
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Eugene Sajine <euguess@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I had almost similar issue - bare repos in my case should be set up under
>> user which only few guys are having password from. So what I did is just a
>> small program which creates the bare repo locally and makes secure copy to
>> this user home. All authentication is hidden from the end user. Then users
>> can access their repos via git protocol. Ialso fillthe repo with some
>> additional info for cgit.
>>
>> Eugene
>
> BTW I'm using "git clone --bare" in this process, so if you have a
> repo with working copy you can create a bare one separately, put it on
> the server and then connect to it via "git remote add"
>
> Eugene
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-12 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-09 16:06 get git not to care about permissions sconeman
2009-11-12 5:44 ` Jay Soffian
2009-11-12 15:44 ` Matt Schoen
2009-11-12 16:10 ` Thomas Rast
2009-11-12 21:44 ` Matt Schoen
2009-11-15 12:31 ` Thomas Rast
[not found] ` <76c5b8580911111327k43daece9s2e71d0a2b8adcebd@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <76c5b8580911111334p76232995qbd6bf6b06d250854@mail.gmail.com>
2009-11-12 15:28 ` Eugene Sajine
2009-11-12 15:47 ` Matt Schoen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3cf217d80911120747k116d3747g75dc60f17e00127@mail.gmail.com \
--to=mtschoen@gmail.com \
--cc=euguess@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).