From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: Yet another base64 patch Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 12:25:40 -0700 Message-ID: <425EC3B4.6090908@zytor.com> References: <425DEF64.60108@zytor.com> <20050414022413.GB18655@64m.dyndns.org> <425E0174.4080404@zytor.com> <20050414024228.GC18655@64m.dyndns.org> <425E0D62.9000401@zytor.com> <425EA152.4090506@zytor.com> <20050414191157.GA27696@outpost.ds9a.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linus Torvalds , Christopher Li , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Apr 14 21:24:31 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DM9wF-0007kY-Ok for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 21:23:44 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261601AbVDNT0v (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:26:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261602AbVDNT0v (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:26:51 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([209.128.68.124]:49041 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261601AbVDNTZ5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:25:57 -0400 Received: from [172.27.0.18] (c-67-169-23-106.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.169.23.106]) (authenticated bits=0) by terminus.zytor.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j3EJPfBN011190 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 14 Apr 2005 12:25:42 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-1.3.2 (X11/20050324) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: bert hubert In-Reply-To: <20050414191157.GA27696@outpost.ds9a.nl> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on terminus.zytor.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org bert hubert wrote: > > That may be true :-), but from the "front lines" I can report that > directories with > 32000 or > 65000 entries is *asking* for trouble. There > is a whole chain of systems that need to get things right for huge > directories to work well, and it often is not that way. > Specifics, please? -hpa