From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: Yet another base64 patch Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 18:06:28 -0700 Message-ID: <425F1394.5020709@zytor.com> References: <425DEF64.60108@zytor.com> <20050414022413.GB18655@64m.dyndns.org> <425E0174.4080404@zytor.com> <20050414024228.GC18655@64m.dyndns.org> <425E0D62.9000401@zytor.com> <425EA152.4090506@zytor.com> <20050414191157.GA27696@outpost.ds9a.nl> <425EC3B4.6090908@zytor.com> <20050414214756.GA31249@outpost.ds9a.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: bert hubert , Christopher Li , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Apr 15 03:04:12 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DMFFb-0007tJ-Mw for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 03:04:03 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261692AbVDOBG6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Apr 2005 21:06:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261702AbVDOBG6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Apr 2005 21:06:58 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([209.128.68.124]:30619 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261692AbVDOBGr (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Apr 2005 21:06:47 -0400 Received: from [10.4.1.13] (yardgnome.orionmulti.com [209.128.68.65]) (authenticated bits=0) by terminus.zytor.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j3F16X3n016208 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 14 Apr 2005 18:06:33 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-1.3.2 (X11/20050324) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on terminus.zytor.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Even something as simple as "ls -l" has been known to have O(n**2) > behaviour for big directories. > For filesystems with linear directories, sure. For sane filesystems, it should have O(n log n). -hpa