From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Greaves Subject: Re: [PATCH] Docs update Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 22:16:11 +0100 Message-ID: <4268181B.6050906@dgreaves.com> References: <42680FCC.6030901@dgreaves.com> <20050421204348.GJ7443@pasky.ji.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: GIT Mailing Lists X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Apr 21 23:13:17 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DOixf-0005Xg-6I for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 23:11:47 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261883AbVDUVQQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Apr 2005 17:16:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261884AbVDUVQP (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Apr 2005 17:16:15 -0400 Received: from s2.ukfsn.org ([217.158.120.143]:20119 "EHLO mail.ukfsn.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261883AbVDUVQN (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Apr 2005 17:16:13 -0400 Received: from localhost (lucy.ukfsn.org [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 198C2E6D99; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 22:14:21 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lucy.ukfsn.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07132-03; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 22:14:21 +0100 (BST) Received: from oak.dgreaves.com (modem-2040.lynx.dialup.pol.co.uk [217.135.199.248]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E842E6D94; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 22:14:20 +0100 (BST) Received: from ash.dgreaves.com ([10.0.0.90]) by oak.dgreaves.com with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1DOj1v-0002h1-MS; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 22:16:11 +0100 User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: Petr Baudis In-Reply-To: <20050421204348.GJ7443@pasky.ji.cz> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Petr Baudis wrote: > > Make a choice - either you are describing git or Cogito. The frmer has > no RSYNC_FLAGS and does not care about any heads or anything at all (you > might mention it as a recommended convention, though). I was going to do both - surely that's OK? The only reason it's core so far is that I started working my way through the code alphabetically (having no other clue where to start!) As it turns out it will probably make sense to do all the core first - but I don't want to miss things so as I read through all the mails and extract content, I make a note of things like environment variables which I'll bulk up and cross reference later. I may even change my mind and make notes on Cogito if that takes my fancy too ;) I know it's not polished yet - but I'd rather publish it and have people catch mistakes. David