From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rhys Hardwick Subject: Re: Pulling linux-2.6.git with gitinit.sh and gitpull.sh fails Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 00:24:32 +0100 Message-ID: <426987B0.8020707@rhyshardwick.co.uk> References: <200504221442.29488.rhys@rhyshardwick.co.uk> <200504221554.04749.rhys@rhyshardwick.co.uk> <1114183357.29271.31.camel@nosferatu.lan> <200504221624.27769.rhys@rhyshardwick.co.uk> <20050422224358.GF21204@pasky.ji.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Apr 23 01:21:30 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DP7Sf-0005eL-Gn for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 01:21:25 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261304AbVDVXZ7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Apr 2005 19:25:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261309AbVDVXZ7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Apr 2005 19:25:59 -0400 Received: from smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.11.35]:54104 "HELO smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261304AbVDVXZy (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Apr 2005 19:25:54 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.rhyshardwick.co.uk) (rhys?hardwick@81.103.65.153 with plain) by smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Apr 2005 23:25:50 -0000 Received: from [192.168.1.55] (helo=[192.168.1.55]) by mail.rhyshardwick.co.uk with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1DP7Wv-000558-Mh for git@vger.kernel.org; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 00:25:49 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: git@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20050422224358.GF21204@pasky.ji.cz> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Petr Baudis wrote: > Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 05:24:27PM CEST, I got a letter > where Rhys Hardwick told me that... > >>>Seems your /bin/sh do not support 'echo -e' ... Know what provides >>>your /bin/sh (I think ash at least do support it)? >>> >>>Petr, I think you should really start to consider going full bash? >> >>I use dash... > > > FYI, I've succumbed to the real world out there and switched the whole > thing to use bash. > Thanks for that Petr. I am wondering, what do you and the other developers use? When I apt-get install ash (debian unstable), which I tried to do to fix this problem, all it did was add a symlink to dash!!