From: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
"Bodo Eggert <harvested.in.lkml@posting.7eggert.dyndns.org>"
<7eggert@gmx.de>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark
Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 19:14:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4277B15F.1020102@lsrfire.ath.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4277A52E.1020601@tmr.com>
Bill Davidsen schrieb:
> On the theory that my first post got lost, why use /usr/bin/env at
> all, when bash already does that substitution? To support people who
> use other shells?
>
> ie.: FOO=xx perl -e '$a=$ENV{FOO}; print "$a\n"'
/usr/bin/env is used in scripts in the shebang line (the very first line
of the script, starting with "#!", which denotes the interpreter to use
for that script) to make a PATH search for the real interpreter.
Some folks keep their python (or Perl, or Bash etc.) in /usr/local/bin
or in $HOME, that's why this construct is needed at all.
Changing environment variables is not the goal, insofar this usage
exploits only a side-effect of env. It is portable in practice because
env is in /usr/bin on most modern systems.
So you could replace this first line of a bash script:
#!/usr/bin/env python
with this:
#!python
except that the latter doesn't work because you need to specify an
absolute path there. :]
Rene
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-03 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3YQn9-8qX-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <3ZLEF-56n-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <3ZM7L-5ot-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <3ZN3P-69A-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <3ZNdz-6gK-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-05-03 1:16 ` Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark Bodo Eggert <harvested.in.lkml@posting.7eggert.dyndns.org>
2005-05-03 1:29 ` Matt Mackall
2005-05-03 16:22 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-05-03 17:14 ` Rene Scharfe [this message]
2005-05-04 17:51 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-04-30 14:44 Adam J. Richter
2005-04-30 16:06 ` Matt Mackall
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-04-26 0:41 Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks Matt Mackall
2005-04-26 2:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-29 6:01 ` Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark Matt Mackall
2005-04-29 6:40 ` Sean
2005-04-29 7:40 ` Matt Mackall
2005-04-29 8:40 ` Sean
2005-04-29 14:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-29 15:18 ` Morten Welinder
2005-04-29 16:52 ` Matt Mackall
2005-05-02 16:10 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-05-02 19:02 ` Sean
2005-05-02 22:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-02 22:30 ` Matt Mackall
2005-05-02 22:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-03 0:00 ` Matt Mackall
2005-05-03 2:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-03 3:29 ` Matt Mackall
2005-05-03 4:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-03 4:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-03 4:27 ` Matt Mackall
2005-05-03 8:45 ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-04-29 15:44 ` Tom Lord
2005-04-29 15:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-29 17:34 ` Tom Lord
2005-04-29 17:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-29 18:08 ` Tom Lord
2005-04-29 18:33 ` Sean
2005-04-29 18:54 ` Tom Lord
2005-04-29 19:13 ` Sean
2005-04-29 19:22 ` Tom Lord
2005-04-29 19:28 ` Tom Lord
2005-04-29 19:47 ` Noel Maddy
2005-04-29 19:54 ` Tom Lord
2005-04-29 20:13 ` Andrew Timberlake-Newell
2005-04-29 20:26 ` Tom Lord
2005-04-29 20:57 ` Andrew Timberlake-Newell
2005-04-29 20:16 ` Morgan Schweers
2005-04-29 20:21 ` Noel Maddy
2005-04-29 20:44 ` Tom Lord
2005-04-29 21:57 ` Denys Duchier
2005-04-29 21:45 ` Horst von Brand
2005-05-02 21:06 ` Tom Lord
2005-05-03 0:24 ` Kevin Smith
2005-05-02 16:15 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-04-29 16:37 ` Matt Mackall
2005-04-29 17:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-29 19:12 ` Matt Mackall
2005-04-29 19:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-29 20:23 ` Matt Mackall
2005-04-29 20:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-29 21:20 ` Matt Mackall
2005-04-29 16:46 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-04-29 20:19 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-04-29 22:30 ` Olivier Galibert
2005-04-29 22:47 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-04-29 20:30 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-04-29 20:39 ` Matt Mackall
2005-04-30 2:52 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-04-30 15:20 ` Matt Mackall
2005-04-30 16:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-05-02 15:49 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-05-02 16:14 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-05-03 17:40 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-05-02 16:17 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-05-02 16:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-02 17:18 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-02 17:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-02 18:17 ` Edgar Toernig
2005-05-02 20:54 ` Sam Ravnborg
2005-05-02 17:20 ` Ryan Anderson
2005-05-02 17:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-02 21:17 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-05-03 17:43 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4277B15F.1020102@lsrfire.ath.cx \
--to=rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx \
--cc=7eggert@gmx.de \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=ryan@michonline.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).