From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: Git-aware Darcs: a tutorial Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 10:55:12 -0700 Message-ID: <427FA400.2060408@zytor.com> References: <7i4qdc8isd.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: darcs-devel@abridgegame.org, darcs-users@abridgegame.org, Git Mailing List X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon May 09 20:33:09 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DVCNW-0004Vb-Jr for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 09 May 2005 19:49:14 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261460AbVEIR4H (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2005 13:56:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261465AbVEIR4H (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2005 13:56:07 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([209.128.68.124]:20150 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261460AbVEIRzy (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2005 13:55:54 -0400 Received: from [10.4.1.13] (yardgnome.orionmulti.com [209.128.68.65]) (authenticated bits=0) by terminus.zytor.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j49HtIKg028051 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 9 May 2005 10:55:18 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-1.3.2 (X11/20050324) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: Juliusz Chroboczek In-Reply-To: <7i4qdc8isd.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.84, clamav-milter version 0.84e on localhost X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on terminus.zytor.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > 0. What is Darcs-git > > Darcs-git is a branch of Darcs that can work with Git repositories. > > Darcs-git is deliberately Darcs, not Git. All commands either work in > the same way on Git repositories as on Darcs repositories, or they > fail. If you're a Darcs user, you'll like darcs-git. If you're a Git > user, you'll probably find it infuriating. > > On the other hand, Darcs-git uses stock Git repositories; a Darcs > command either works as-is on a Git repository, or fails. > How is it, performance-wise? -hpa