From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: History messup Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 12:01:59 -0700 Message-ID: <427FB3A7.8050906@zytor.com> References: <1115657971.19236.33.camel@tglx> <1115659677.16187.393.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> <1115660903.19236.39.camel@tglx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Woodhouse , git@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon May 09 21:00:28 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DVDQS-0003IX-8H for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 09 May 2005 20:56:20 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261506AbVEITDE (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2005 15:03:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261503AbVEITDE (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2005 15:03:04 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([209.128.68.124]:12473 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261507AbVEITCy (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2005 15:02:54 -0400 Received: from [10.4.1.13] (yardgnome.orionmulti.com [209.128.68.65]) (authenticated bits=0) by terminus.zytor.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j49J24Is029813 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 9 May 2005 12:02:04 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-1.3.2 (X11/20050324) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: tglx@linutronix.de In-Reply-To: <1115660903.19236.39.camel@tglx> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.84, clamav-milter version 0.84e on localhost X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL autolearn=ham version=3.0.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on terminus.zytor.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > That would be really great. A line after "parents" like > > repoid "username/reponame" > > would be sufficient > Seems like a UUID or a SHA-1 identifier would be better. However, one can definitely argue that even the meaning of "a repository" isn't well-defined in the context of git. -hpa