From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: Darcs-git: a few notes for Git hackers Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 15:20:56 -0700 Message-ID: <427FE248.7040403@zytor.com> References: <7ihdhc5le2.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr> <20050509212842.GC15712@pasky.ji.cz> <7iu0lc129m.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Petr Baudis , Git Mailing List , darcs-devel@abridgegame.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue May 10 00:14:49 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DVGVr-0006e9-D0 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 10 May 2005 00:14:07 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261547AbVEIWVV (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2005 18:21:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261548AbVEIWVV (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2005 18:21:21 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([209.128.68.124]:28099 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261547AbVEIWVS (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2005 18:21:18 -0400 Received: from [172.27.0.18] (c-67-169-23-106.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.169.23.106]) (authenticated bits=0) by terminus.zytor.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j49MKuUv001628 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 9 May 2005 15:20:58 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-1.3.2 (X11/20050324) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: Juliusz Chroboczek In-Reply-To: <7iu0lc129m.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.84, clamav-milter version 0.84e on localhost X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on terminus.zytor.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > Ahoj, > > >>FWIW, Cogito does not lock at all yet - this is one of the things which >>should be fixed soon. > > > I see. Let me know if you decide to use a different name for the lock > file so I can switch to using the same one as yours. > Are you using flock(), or some other contraption that breaks if a process dies unexpectedly? -hpa