From: David Greaves <david@dgreaves.com>
To: Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>
Cc: Jonas Fonseca <fonseca@diku.dk>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Embedding asciidoc manpages in the cg scripts
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 23:20:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4282851A.2010305@dgreaves.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050511213217.GG22686@pasky.ji.cz>
Petr Baudis wrote:
>> #
>>+# NAME
>>+# ----
>>+# cg-add - add files to a GIT repository
>>
>>
>
>Half of this is useless, too.
>
>I think you should just keep the first paragraph of the files as it is
>now. Don't touch it, just parse it.
>
>
A bit harsh Petr.
Isn't the idea of using an already written tool that you don't _have_ to
parse it?
Where, consistently, do the cg-files have a 1 line summary.
>>+#
>>+# SYNOPSIS
>>+# --------
>>
>>
>No need for this heading either.
>
>
Actually there is :)
asciidoc won't produce a manpage without it.
>>+USAGE="cg-add FILE..."
>>+#
>>+# DESCRIPTION
>>+# -----------
>> # Takes a list of file names at the command line, and schedules them
>> # for addition to the GIT repository at the next commit.
>>+#
>>+# The command will fail if one of the given files does not exist.
>>+#
>>+# cg-add is part of Cogito, an SCM-like toolkit for managing GIT trees.
>>
>>
>
>Useless.
>
>
Yes - if you happen to have written and breathed the code - not so
useless if you're a normal user.
It cogito is ever installed as part of a distro (maybe even by default)
then it would be nice if "man cg-add" actually mentioned it was part of
cogito and git...
>>+#
>>+# OPTIONS
>>+# -------
>>+# No options.
>>
>>
>
>The rest of DESCRIPTION and OPTIONS looks fine.
>
>I'd just expect you to be much less intrusive in the in-file comments
>and do more work when processing the stuff. I'm commenting on how it
>looks inside of the sources - do whatever is necessary when processing
>it to generate a proper-looking manpage from it.
>
>
Having worked hard on being consistent throughout the git docs I'd say
that a little excess verbiage in the comments is a worthwhile price. I
don't think you can worry about performance or anything - these _are_
shell scripts!
Maybe you'd be happier if they were moved to the bottom of the file and
preceded with:
#asciidoc follows
Or if you don't like that then maybe keep them external.
David
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-11 22:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-11 1:44 [RFC] Embedding asciidoc manpages in the cg scripts Jonas Fonseca
2005-05-11 21:32 ` Petr Baudis
2005-05-11 22:20 ` David Greaves [this message]
2005-05-11 22:48 ` Petr Baudis
2005-05-13 18:48 ` Jonas Fonseca
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4282851A.2010305@dgreaves.com \
--to=david@dgreaves.com \
--cc=fonseca@diku.dk \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasky@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox