From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFD] Add repoid identifier to commit [its a workspace id, isn't it?] Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 15:26:53 -0700 Message-ID: <428529AD.5000401@zytor.com> References: <1115847510.22180.108.camel@tglx> <428291CD.7010701@zytor.com> <2cfc4032050512183788e01fc@mail.gmail.com> <20050513222502.GD32232@pasky.ji.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jon Seymour , tglx@linutronix.de, git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat May 14 00:30:38 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DWifd-0002Yk-GD for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 14 May 2005 00:30:13 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262594AbVEMW3j (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 May 2005 18:29:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262600AbVEMW3X (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 May 2005 18:29:23 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([209.128.68.124]:6305 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262594AbVEMW1V (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 May 2005 18:27:21 -0400 Received: from [10.4.1.13] (yardgnome.orionmulti.com [209.128.68.65]) (authenticated bits=0) by terminus.zytor.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j4DMR3Vw012818 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 13 May 2005 15:27:03 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-1.3.2 (X11/20050324) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: Petr Baudis In-Reply-To: <20050513222502.GD32232@pasky.ji.cz> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.84, clamav-milter version 0.84e on localhost X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on terminus.zytor.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Petr Baudis wrote: > > Why not just call the thing "branch"? It's as well eligible for that > term as anything. :-) > Because cogito already calls too many things "branches"? -hpa