git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 22:16:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42BA1B68.9040505@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0506221853280.11175@ppc970.osdl.org>

Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> 
>>With BK, tags came with each pull.  With git, you have to go "outside 
>>the system" (rsync) just get the new tags.
> 
> 
> You don't have to use rsync, and you don't have to go outside the system. 
> That was my point: you can use "git-ssh-pull" to pull the tags.

OK, understood.


> But yes, you have to explicitly ask for them by name, ie the other side 
> has to let you know: "Oh, btw, I created a 'xyz' tag for you". And having 
> another helper script to hide the details of how git-*-pull handles tags 
> is obviously also a good idea, although it's pretty low on my list of 
> things to worry about.

The problem is still that nothing says "oh, btw, I created 'xyz' tag for 
you" AFAICS?

IMO the user (GregKH and me, at least) just wants to know their set of 
tags and heads is up-to-date on local disk.  Wants to know what tags are 
out there.  It's quite annoying when two data sets are out of sync 
(.git/objects and .git/refs/tags).

Asking for the tag by name isn't useful at all, in that regard, because 
that requires that the user already know what tags are available.  To 
get that info, one must use rsync, gitweb, or a subscription to Psychic 
Friends Network.

	Jeff



  reply	other threads:[~2005-06-23  2:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 98+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-22 22:24 Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers Jeff Garzik
2005-06-22 22:40 ` Dave Jones
2005-06-22 22:47   ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-22 22:52     ` Dave Jones
2005-06-23  0:14       ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-25  3:33   ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-25 17:29     ` Dave Jones
2005-06-22 23:09 ` Greg KH
2005-06-22 23:25   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23  0:05     ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-23  0:29       ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23  1:47         ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-23  1:56           ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23  2:16             ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2005-06-23  2:39               ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23  3:06                 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-23  3:24                   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23  5:16                     ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-23  5:58                       ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23  6:20                         ` Greg KH
2005-06-23  6:51                           ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23  7:11                             ` Greg KH
2005-06-23  7:03                         ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-23  7:38                         ` Petr Baudis
2005-06-23  8:18                           ` Martin Langhoff
2005-06-23  8:30                         ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-06-23 14:31                       ` Horst von Brand
2005-06-22 23:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23  0:15   ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-23  1:53     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23  7:06       ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-23 15:29         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23  0:33   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23  2:04   ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-23  2:28     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23  3:52       ` Adam Kropelin
2005-06-23  4:54         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23  5:35           ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-23  6:37             ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23  6:07           ` Miles Bader
2005-06-23  7:15       ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-23 16:06         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-23  8:01   ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-06-23  4:23 ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-06-23 12:25 ` Dave Airlie
2005-06-23 23:56 ` Mercurial vs " Matt Mackall
2005-06-24  6:41   ` Petr Baudis
2005-06-24 12:38     ` Christopher Li
2005-06-28 15:00       ` Petr Baudis
2005-06-28 15:10         ` Andrew Thompson
2005-06-28 15:35           ` Petr Baudis
2005-06-28 21:54           ` Horst von Brand
2005-06-28 18:47             ` Christopher Li
2005-06-29  0:12             ` Kyle Moffett
2005-06-28 18:01         ` Matt Mackall
2005-06-28 20:27           ` Kyle Moffett
2005-06-28 20:45             ` Sean
2005-06-28 22:14               ` Matt Mackall
2005-06-28 22:23                 ` Sean
2005-06-28 22:47                   ` Kyle Moffett
2005-06-28 22:49                   ` Matt Mackall
2005-06-28 22:59                     ` Sean
2005-06-28 23:25                       ` Kyle Moffett
2005-06-28 23:37                         ` Sean
2005-06-29  0:08                           ` Kyle Moffett
2005-06-29  0:25                             ` Sean
2005-06-29  3:53                               ` Kyle Moffett
2005-06-29 10:27                                 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-06-28 23:29                       ` Matt Mackall
2005-06-29  6:32             ` Thomas Arendsen Hein
2005-06-24 13:06     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-06-24 13:39       ` Theodore Ts'o
2005-06-24 13:46         ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2005-06-24 12:19           ` Christopher Li
2005-06-24 13:57       ` Kevin Smith
2005-06-24 18:03         ` Matt Mackall
2005-06-28 15:07         ` Petr Baudis
2005-06-28 15:15           ` Sven Verdoolaege
2005-06-28 15:34             ` Petr Baudis
2005-06-28 16:50           ` Cygwin and Native MS Windows (was: Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers) Kevin Smith
2005-06-28 16:51           ` Cogito vs. Git " Kevin Smith
2005-06-28 20:54             ` Petr Baudis
2005-06-24 13:16     ` Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers Matthias Urlichs
2005-06-24 19:00       ` Linus Torvalds
2005-06-24 19:25         ` John W. Linville
2005-06-24 22:38         ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-24 21:11       ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-06-24 22:08       ` Should "git-read-tree -m -u" delete files? Junio C Hamano
2005-06-24 22:45     ` Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers Joel Becker
2005-06-24 23:08   ` Kyle Moffett
2005-06-27 18:31   ` Pavel Machek
2005-06-27 19:05     ` Kyle Moffett
2005-06-27 19:40     ` Matt Mackall
2005-06-27 19:51       ` Benjamin LaHaise
2005-06-27 20:51         ` Matt Mackall
2005-06-27 21:53         ` Ed Tomlinson
2005-07-08 15:18 ` Amin Azez
2005-07-11  8:56   ` Amin Azez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42BA1B68.9040505@pobox.com \
    --to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).