From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luc Van Oostenryck Subject: Re: new features in gitk Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 22:24:45 +0200 Message-ID: <42C1B20D.2000502@looxix.net> References: <17088.31798.17291.605567@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <42C08265.2050209@looxix.net> <17088.36232.479492.643878@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jun 28 22:19:33 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DnMXj-0001sa-Ri for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 22:18:52 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261356AbVF1UYZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jun 2005 16:24:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261432AbVF1UYU (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jun 2005 16:24:20 -0400 Received: from smtp3.mail.be.easynet.net ([212.100.160.66]:24246 "EHLO smtp3.mail.be.easynet.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261356AbVF1UVI (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jun 2005 16:21:08 -0400 Received: from [81.188.80.222] (helo=ralph05.pc.home) by smtp3.mail.be.easynet.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1DnMZs-0005nQ-JV; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 22:21:04 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=looxix.net) by ralph05.pc.home with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 1DnMdS-0005b3-00; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 22:24:46 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: Paul Mackerras In-Reply-To: <17088.36232.479492.643878@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Paul Mackerras wrote: > Luc Van Oostenryck writes: > > >>I find the patch generation very usefull (when I've seen the tool a few days ago, I've said to myself: >>"what a wonderfull tool, if only I could create a patch from this") >>but it doesn't work for me (the first three entries stay always in grey, only the last one "Create tag" is in black). >>I'm missing something ? > > > The diffs and patches are between the selected commit (one that you > clicked on with the left button and which is shown with a grey > background) and the commit where you click the right button. That was > the best way I could think of to indicate which were the two commits > to diff. If you (or anyone) has a better suggestion, let me know. > > Paul. OK I see it now, it works nicely. I didn't found the tric yesterday because I was thinking: one commit -> one patch, but it's probably more usefull like it is now. Thanks.