From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: Tags Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2005 14:16:44 -0700 Message-ID: <42C7043C.9080904@zytor.com> References: <42C454B2.6090307@zytor.com> <42C462CD.9010909@zytor.com> <42C46B86.8070006@zytor.com> <42C5714A.1020203@zytor.com> <42C5C75F.4040100@zytor.com> <42C5DA77.4030107@zytor.com> <42C6D318.8050108@zytor.com> <42C6D5AD.9070304@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linus Torvalds , Daniel Barkalow , Git Mailing List , Junio C Hamano , ftpadmin@kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jul 02 23:17:46 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DopMg-000282-1w for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2005 23:17:30 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261279AbVGBVRT (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jul 2005 17:17:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261280AbVGBVRT (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jul 2005 17:17:19 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([209.128.68.124]:14219 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261279AbVGBVRP (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jul 2005 17:17:15 -0400 Received: from [172.27.0.18] (c-67-180-239-42.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.180.239.42]) (authenticated bits=0) by terminus.zytor.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j62LGj9k023112 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 2 Jul 2005 14:16:46 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-1.3.3 (X11/20050513) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: "Eric W. Biederman" In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.85.1, clamav-milter version 0.85 on localhost X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL autolearn=no version=3.0.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on terminus.zytor.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Eric W. Biederman wrote: > "H. Peter Anvin" writes: > > >>Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> >>>?? Isn't that what ssh is? >>>To some extent a lot depends on how active you expect people to >>>try and forge things. If there is an expectation of honesty >>>you are fine. >> >>I can't afford to have that. > > So you are now your requirements are more stringent then sourceforge? > Sourcefore limited things by reducing the scope of commits per > project. But once you had commit access to a project you could do > just about anything. > They're not using a single global object storage. -hpa