From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: A Large Angry SCM Subject: Re: Tags Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2005 18:02:23 -0400 Message-ID: <42C70EEF.6050207@gmail.com> References: <42C454B2.6090307@zytor.com> <42C462CD.9010909@zytor.com> <42C46B86.8070006@zytor.com> <42C5714A.1020203@zytor.com> <42C5C75F.4040100@zytor.com> <42C5DA77.4030107@zytor.com> <42C6D318.8050108@zytor.com> <42C6D5AD.9070304@zytor.com> <42C7043C.9080904@zytor.com> <42C70A5B.9070606@zytor.com> Reply-To: gitzilla@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Linus Torvalds , "Eric W. Biederman" , Daniel Barkalow , Junio C Hamano , ftpadmin@kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jul 03 00:09:22 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DoqAj-0005yR-MN for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 00:09:13 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261302AbVGBWHb (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jul 2005 18:07:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261312AbVGBWDf (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jul 2005 18:03:35 -0400 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.197]:23342 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261306AbVGBWC0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jul 2005 18:02:26 -0400 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i31so514929wra for ; Sat, 02 Jul 2005 15:02:26 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=E72RB5MUqn2nJ5cAW62nQjAN8A1Y21+/UX58bWxeon05VJ5oPq3dY2MNsJyBF/nxInO99RrrGxcDmFjCF7hx10TTN87j66d2mIsiLVHmLn8PFxUr1hARGLsiBNu+HeGc1E+QlJdqy5OUBI73V7LNRy2DHskb249kzoDzgo17TJI= Received: by 10.54.26.19 with SMTP id 19mr2617602wrz; Sat, 02 Jul 2005 15:02:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.0.0.6? ([70.89.97.97]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id d74sm2768623wra.2005.07.02.15.02.25; Sat, 02 Jul 2005 15:02:26 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041207) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: Git Mailing List In-Reply-To: <42C70A5B.9070606@zytor.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org H. Peter Anvin wrote: ... > > OK, so let me retell what I think I hear you say: > > - Store all the tags in the object store; they may conflict. > - Let each source user have a set of refs, and provide a method for the > end user to select which refs to get. > > In other words, the only way (other than knowing what GPG keys to trust) > to distinguish between your "v2.6.12" and J. Random Hacker's "v2.6.12" > is that the former is referenced by *your* refs as opposed to JRH's > refs. This also means the refs cannot be uniquely rebuilt from the > object storage. Why have tag objects at all?