* using git without blobs in the object database
@ 2005-07-07 12:10 Bryan Larsen
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Bryan Larsen @ 2005-07-07 12:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
Use Case: A large set of large binary files, geographically
distributed. Each location has some unique files, some identical files
and some slightly modified files.
I want to use git to tell me what changed and when. But I cannot afford
to have it store the blobs in the object database, nor do I need to;
knowing the signature of previous objects is good enough.
It seems to me that most operations should work without these objects,
and that some people do so. For instance, git-update-cache has a
--cacheinfo option that facilitates this operation.
But not all commands work so well. For instance, git-write-tree will
fail if --cacheinfo was used to add a file. This failure is caused by a
call to check_valid_sha1(). It appears that this check is not strictly
necessary, just very useful for normal operation.
Would a patch that added a flag "--disable-sha1-check" to git-write-tree
be accepted? I hope that's all I need to add, but I haven't completed
my evaluation yet.
thanks,
Bryan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2005-07-07 12:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-07-07 12:10 using git without blobs in the object database Bryan Larsen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).