From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Ellson Subject: Re: BUG: "rpmbuild -ta cogito-0.12.tar.gz" fails Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 09:04:25 -0400 Message-ID: <42CD2859.10608@research.att.com> References: <20050707062019.GL5324@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jul 07 16:54:30 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DqXlN-0002rM-U8 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 16:54:06 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261456AbVGGNW7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jul 2005 09:22:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261497AbVGGNHB (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jul 2005 09:07:01 -0400 Received: from mail-dark.research.att.com ([192.20.225.112]:38544 "EHLO mail-yellow.research.att.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261450AbVGGNEd (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jul 2005 09:04:33 -0400 Received: from [135.207.24.103] (ellson.research.att.com [135.207.24.103]) by bigmail.research.att.com (8.13.3+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j67D92tC000957; Thu, 7 Jul 2005 09:09:05 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-7 (X11/20050623) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: Chris Wright In-Reply-To: <20050707062019.GL5324@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Chris Wright wrote: >* John Ellson (ellson@research.att.com) wrote: > > >>"rpmbuild -ta cogito-0.12.tar.gz" fails because cogito.spec.in refers to >>".bz2" in its "Source:" line, instead of to ".gz". >> >> > >Just grab the .bz2, or the SRPM http://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/cogito/RPMS >(still mirroring, I just uploaded it a bit ago) > > But: cd cogito cg-update make dist rpmbuild -ta cogito-0.12.tar.gz still doesn't work. Do you have a different process for generating the initial cogito-0.12-1src.rpm ? > > >>This is obviously a trivial patch. Do I need prior approval to send >>patches to this group? What is the the significance of >>"Signed-off-by:" Is there a FAQ I should read? >> >> > >No approval needed. Signed-off-by is in reference to the Developer's >Certificate of Origin 1.1 (see item 11 in the Linux kernel's source file >Documentation/SubmittingPatches). > > Thanks. Thats what I was looking for. John