From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-cvsimport-script: handling of tags Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 14:33:25 -0700 Message-ID: <431E0B25.5000104@zytor.com> References: <431DD381.4050709@zytor.com> <431DE640.8050901@zytor.com> <431DFB04.5020701@zytor.com> <46a038f905090614216eca87eb@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Git Mailing List , Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Sep 06 23:35:06 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ECl4n-0008Go-7Z for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 23:33:57 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750811AbVIFVdq (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2005 17:33:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750820AbVIFVdp (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2005 17:33:45 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([209.128.68.124]:27599 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750811AbVIFVdp (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2005 17:33:45 -0400 Received: from [10.4.1.13] (yardgnome.orionmulti.com [209.128.68.65]) (authenticated bits=0) by terminus.zytor.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j86LXU9N020206 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 6 Sep 2005 14:33:31 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050720) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: martin.langhoff@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <46a038f905090614216eca87eb@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.86.2, clamav-milter version 0.86 on localhost X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on terminus.zytor.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Martin Langhoff wrote: > > Tell me more about how you are trying the 'recognize merge'. It is a > pretty unsophisticated thing, as it trusts the commit message in the > first place. But when it works, it works. > Perhaps it would be good to know what it expects in the commit message? My style has always be to use tags for merges; tag the origin branch as well as before and after on the receiving branch. -hpa