Re: [PATCH 00/22] cache cursors: an introduction

[Tim Ottinger <tottinge@progeny.com>]

Junio C Hamano wrote:

>Tim Ottinger <tottinge@progeny.com> writes:
>
>  
>
>>2) However unimportant, I'm an old OO guy and object_cmd looks like 
>>object.command to me.
>>    
>>
>
>If you are OO then would not object_method remind you of object->method ??
>
>  
>
>>>+  init_cc
>>>+  next_cc, prev_cc
>>>      
>>>
>>cc_init?
>>cc_next, cc_previous
>>    
>>
>
>Nah, either set is fine as long as it is internally consistent.
>I tend to prefer "do-this-to-that" so init_cc and next_cc are
>fine by me (just one person's opinion, not a dictator's ruling).
>
>  
>
I guess it depends on whether you're looking at command completion or
not. Most the time I have a thing, and want to do something to it.  Then
starting with cc_ helps, but starting with init_ only tells me what I can
init -- more filtering on my part.

Of course, i can just open the darned file and read it. ;-)  So it's a 
matter
of what you and your tools like best.  Starting with the subject does sort
better, though. 


-- 
                             ><>
... either 'way ahead of the game, or 'way out in left field.