From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: A Large Angry SCM Subject: Re: git version Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:31:03 -0400 Message-ID: <432985A7.5070900@gmail.com> References: Reply-To: gitzilla@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Sep 15 16:34:47 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EFule-00071k-DX for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 16:31:14 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965263AbVIOObM convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:31:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965265AbVIOObM (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:31:12 -0400 Received: from xproxy.gmail.com ([66.249.82.197]:7373 "EHLO xproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965263AbVIOObK (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:31:10 -0400 Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i27so30059wxd for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 07:31:07 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=s/hfx6NaEpJS5XGmsPid3eMTAaDzEx1plQgcZvdXWQpCAZAShaOUBvVaMIxokuWMbykpt4Ny+AKQYfP4gNkDxn/bsrfYLIoLJumNkcaBeAylZlUZoyBLZjpp2Th4+SzvOy6g9GO2IRXCqjTZ2HOpg7iSR4SPNMPJ+k1GVDHbPJs= Received: by 10.70.50.6 with SMTP id x6mr325798wxx; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 07:31:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.0.0.6? ( [70.89.97.97]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id i13sm66762wxd.2005.09.15.07.31.05; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 07:31:06 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041207) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_K=E5gedal?= In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: David K=E5gedal wrote: > Why is "git --version" called so, and not "git version"? It works > just like any other command, except that it is implemented internally > in the git script. >=20 > The "git" command takes a subcommand that does some action or simply > prints some informational output. The "version" subcommand fits > nicely into that, and I don't see any need to prepend "--" to it. >=20 Consistency with other (non Git) commands was why I suggested the=20 "--version" form when the discussion happened.