From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: Why does git-core 0.99.7 require python 2.4? Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 16:24:55 -0700 Message-ID: <432F48C7.8070405@zytor.com> References: <432F0C66.7060402@zytor.com> <20050919200222.GA11322@c165.ib.student.liu.se> <7vslw0lqvd.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <432F26E9.9090707@zytor.com> <7v7jdclpme.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <432F3253.3070201@zytor.com> <20050919231704.GA19276@unpythonic.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Junio C Hamano , Fredrik Kuivinen , Git Mailing List X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Sep 20 01:25:36 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EHV0s-00051b-49 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 01:25:30 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932640AbVISXZT (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Sep 2005 19:25:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932648AbVISXZT (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Sep 2005 19:25:19 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([209.128.68.124]:27823 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932640AbVISXZS (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Sep 2005 19:25:18 -0400 Received: from [10.4.1.13] (yardgnome.orionmulti.com [209.128.68.65]) (authenticated bits=0) by terminus.zytor.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j8JNP0vS011786 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 19 Sep 2005 16:25:00 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050720) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: jepler@unpythonic.net In-Reply-To: <20050919231704.GA19276@unpythonic.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87, clamav-milter version 0.87 on localhost X-Virus-Status: Clean Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: jepler@unpythonic.net wrote: > It looks like Python2.4's subprocess module is pure Python, and works > with python2.3. > > Could subprocess.py just be included in git? I think that would be the best solution. -hpa