From: A Large Angry SCM <gitzilla@gmail.com>
To: Matthias Urlichs <smurf@smurf.noris.de>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: hared GIT repos (was Re: rsync deprecated but promoted?)
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 11:36:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43399124.8020706@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pan.2005.09.27.06.35.35.834134@smurf.noris.de>
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi, Petr Baudis wrote:
>
>>The thing is, rsync is bad - it will happily put
>>duplicate, redundant, and especially unwanted data to your repository,
>>especially when the shared GIT repositories happen.
>
> Speaking of which -- is anybody working on that one?
>
> I find myself in need of a multiuser shared repository that cannot
> be corrupted (i.e. I want to prevent the users from removing objects,
> and replacing a ref with something that is not a child of the sha1 that's
> already there should also be prevented).
>
Yes. Actually just the protocol spec so far. Although, progress has been
interrupted by the process of moving to the SoCal area from Fla.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-27 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-25 16:32 rsync deprecated but promoted? Zack Brown
2005-09-25 17:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-09-25 19:06 ` Martin Coxall
2005-09-26 13:32 ` Petr Baudis
2005-09-26 14:41 ` Brian Gerst
2005-09-26 16:36 ` Petr Baudis
2005-09-26 16:47 ` Brian Gerst
2005-09-26 15:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-26 16:38 ` Petr Baudis
2005-09-26 16:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-10 23:17 ` Petr Baudis
2005-09-26 16:44 ` walt
2005-09-26 17:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-26 19:23 ` walt
2005-09-26 20:12 ` Johannes Schindelin
2005-09-26 20:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-09-26 22:13 ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-09-26 22:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-09-26 20:43 ` Petr Baudis
2005-09-27 6:35 ` hared GIT repos (was Re: rsync deprecated but promoted?) Matthias Urlichs
2005-09-27 7:13 ` shared GIT repos Junio C Hamano
2005-09-27 8:45 ` Matthias Urlichs
2005-09-27 9:59 ` Sergey Vlasov
2005-09-27 10:29 ` Matthias Urlichs
2005-09-27 15:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-27 18:36 ` A Large Angry SCM [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43399124.8020706@gmail.com \
--to=gitzilla@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=smurf@smurf.noris.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).