From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: gitweb.cgi Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 09:16:44 -0700 Message-ID: <4356716C.7080003@zytor.com> References: <43546492.3020401@zytor.com> <20051018110725.GB6929@vrfy.org> <43552FC2.3000000@zytor.com> <43559575.1060902@zytor.com> <43559DFE.7060503@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Kay Sievers , Git Mailing List X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Oct 19 18:19:45 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ESGcm-0007Il-Hx for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 18:17:10 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751150AbVJSQRB (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Oct 2005 12:17:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751143AbVJSQRB (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Oct 2005 12:17:01 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([192.83.249.54]:29613 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751097AbVJSQRA (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Oct 2005 12:17:00 -0400 Received: from [172.27.0.18] (c-67-180-238-27.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.180.238.27]) (authenticated bits=0) by terminus.zytor.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j9JGGijT017030 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 19 Oct 2005 09:16:44 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87, clamav-milter version 0.87 on localhost X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL autolearn=no version=3.0.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on terminus.zytor.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Well, I tried again this morning, and _boy_ is it better. The "projects" > thing came up immediately, no waiting. > > Maybe it just took a while for the mod_cache thing to take effect as > Apache swarm members time out? > No, that's not it. It takes killing httpd and restarting it. Rather, it looks like mod_cache in different swarm members doesn't always communicate instantly, which is also underscored by the fact that cache files don't appear into the filesystem until after a while. -hpa