From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: git 0.99.9: Subversion importer breaks RPM generation (rpmbuild bug) Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 11:36:07 -0800 Message-ID: <43667227.9090606@zytor.com> References: <43652934.8000308@zytor.com> <7vy84ajl4c.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20051031064105.GV8041@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <43663EEA.5050102@zytor.com> <7v4q6xfpqg.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Oct 31 20:38:06 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EWfSZ-0005Pp-52 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 20:36:47 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932374AbVJaTgk (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Oct 2005 14:36:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932360AbVJaTgk (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Oct 2005 14:36:40 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([192.83.249.54]:60803 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932374AbVJaTgj (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Oct 2005 14:36:39 -0500 Received: from [10.4.1.13] (yardgnome.orionmulti.com [209.128.68.65]) (authenticated bits=0) by terminus.zytor.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j9VJaCEh002421 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 31 Oct 2005 11:36:12 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: Junio C Hamano In-Reply-To: <7v4q6xfpqg.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87, clamav-milter version 0.87 on localhost X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on terminus.zytor.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano wrote: > > I do not know much about how things are done in the RPM world, > but is there a concept of "the upstream" vs "packaging > maintainer" there? IOW, are the majority of RPM binary packages > done by the upstream maintainer? > It does both ways. I think Chris Wright has been doing the formal maintenance of RPM for Fedora. Latency is an issue, though, especially for kernel.org. -hpa