From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike McCormack Subject: Re: pushing patches to an imap folder Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 10:53:13 +0900 Organization: CodeWeavers Message-ID: <437A9109.6010101@codeweavers.com> References: <43799A67.9030705@codeweavers.com> <7vd5l2qnq6.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <4379B9F6.5020402@codeweavers.com> <7vzmo5ka20.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Martin Langhoff X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Nov 16 02:57:03 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EcCWz-0002ay-UD for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 02:56:14 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965162AbVKPB4L (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2005 20:56:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965163AbVKPB4L (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2005 20:56:11 -0500 Received: from mail.codeweavers.com ([216.251.189.131]:65004 "EHLO mail.codeweavers.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965162AbVKPB4K (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2005 20:56:10 -0500 Received: from foghorn.codeweavers.com ([216.251.189.130] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by mail.codeweavers.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EcCWs-0004KM-7E; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 19:56:09 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050923 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us To: Junio C Hamano In-Reply-To: <7vzmo5ka20.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 216.251.189.130 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mike@codeweavers.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on mail X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.2 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:44:12 +0100) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.codeweavers.com) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano wrote: > Wow. How is the acceptance by wine community? Favorable, I > hope. wine.git hasn't been announced on any of the wine mailing lists yet. As long as we don't get rid of CVS entirely, I don't think there'll be too many complaints. Hopefully when it's announced, we'll have a few GIT users who can tell people why it's good to use. > git-cvsexportcommit? I haven't had a chance to use it myself, > although I have to interoperate with CVS in some projects. > Martin, do you want to do a plug (or brag) here? git-cvsexportcommit looks nice. I guess Alexandre is using something like that now. I was thinking more ambitiously... something like a git-cvsd. That would be a pretty awesome migration tool :) > It is handy, especially for simple things like rebasing topic > branches, when the things are of managable size without using > quilt or StGIT. Do you manage binary files? No, there's no binary files in the Wine CVS (or symlinks ;). > Yes, I saw that value there. Maybe adding hooks to format-patch > so that it can do form-letter-ish things you had to add there > without patching might help? I dunno. I'll have a go at integrating my code with format-patch. Hooks for a template would be helpful. Mike