* [PATCH] git-commit: Having $GIT_COMMITTER_NAME implies -s
@ 2005-11-16 23:38 Andreas Ericsson
2005-11-17 4:28 ` Junio C Hamano
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Ericsson @ 2005-11-16 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
I've been trying, in vain, to tell my colleagues to use the -s flag.
With this patch I can at least fix up their .profile's myself.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se>
---
git-commit.sh | 6 ++----
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
applies-to: a2fe76123d6f5b835d3312a70a02ed4d07e25f8e
d32c78570e25a9718721937b1ee9051e950ad1fd
diff --git a/git-commit.sh b/git-commit.sh
index 41955e8..ff9502c 100755
--- a/git-commit.sh
+++ b/git-commit.sh
@@ -134,8 +134,7 @@ then
cat "$GIT_DIR/MERGE_MSG"
fi | git-stripspace >"$GIT_DIR"/COMMIT_EDITMSG
-case "$signoff" in
-t)
+if [ "$signoff" = t -o "$GIT_COMMITTER_NAME" ]; then
{
echo
git-var GIT_COMMITTER_IDENT | sed -e '
@@ -143,8 +142,7 @@ t)
s/^/Signed-off-by: /
'
} >>"$GIT_DIR"/COMMIT_EDITMSG
- ;;
-esac
+fi
if [ -f "$GIT_DIR/MERGE_HEAD" ]; then
echo "#"
---
0.99.9.GIT
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] git-commit: Having $GIT_COMMITTER_NAME implies -s
2005-11-16 23:38 [PATCH] git-commit: Having $GIT_COMMITTER_NAME implies -s Andreas Ericsson
@ 2005-11-17 4:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-11-17 5:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2005-11-17 4:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andreas Ericsson; +Cc: git
I am not so sure about this. A Signed-off-by line used in the
kernel and git projects has a specific meaning; you've read
SubmittingPatches in either projects, have'nt you?
I do work on a machine from which I make commits to both git
project and my day-job work project. I do not necessarily want
to add Signed-off-by line in commits I make for the latter.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] git-commit: Having $GIT_COMMITTER_NAME implies -s
2005-11-17 4:28 ` Junio C Hamano
@ 2005-11-17 5:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: H. Peter Anvin @ 2005-11-17 5:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: Andreas Ericsson, git
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I am not so sure about this. A Signed-off-by line used in the
> kernel and git projects has a specific meaning; you've read
> SubmittingPatches in either projects, have'nt you?
>
> I do work on a machine from which I make commits to both git
> project and my day-job work project. I do not necessarily want
> to add Signed-off-by line in commits I make for the latter.
>
More importantly, it's vital that a Signed-off-by: line is always added
with explicit awareness of the signer.
-hpa
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-11-17 5:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-11-16 23:38 [PATCH] git-commit: Having $GIT_COMMITTER_NAME implies -s Andreas Ericsson
2005-11-17 4:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-11-17 5:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).