From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>, Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Teach "approxidate" about weekday syntax
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 15:18:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <437D0FC8.6000906@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0511171223110.13959@g5.osdl.org>
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> This allows people to use syntax like "last thursday" for the approxidate.
>
> (Or, indeed, more complex "three thursdays ago", but I suspect that would
> be pretty unusual).
>
> NOTE! The parsing is strictly sequential, so if you do
>
> "one day before last thursday"
>
> it will _not_ do what you think it does. It will take the current time,
> subtract one day, and then go back to the thursday before that. So to get
> what you want, you'd have to write it the other way around:
>
> "last thursday and one day before"
>
> which is insane (it's usually the same as "last wednesday" _except_ if
> today is Thursday, in which case "last wednesday" is yesterday, and "last
> thursday and one day before" is eight days ago).
>
> Similarly,
>
> "last thursday one month ago"
>
> will first go back to last thursday, and then go back one month from
> there, not the other way around.
>
> I doubt anybody would ever use insane dates like that, but I thought I'd
> point out that the approxidate parsing is not exactly "standard English".
>
I believe English would always parse from right to left, it might be the
right thing to do...
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-17 23:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-17 20:36 Teach "approxidate" about weekday syntax Linus Torvalds
2005-11-17 21:27 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-11-17 21:44 ` Johannes Schindelin
2005-11-17 22:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-11-17 23:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-17 23:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-18 12:12 ` David Roundy
2005-11-18 13:20 ` Johannes Schindelin
2005-11-18 16:08 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-11-18 17:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-19 0:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-11-19 0:07 ` Andreas Ericsson
2005-11-19 0:28 ` Randal L. Schwartz
2005-11-19 0:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-18 18:07 ` Matthias Urlichs
2005-11-20 23:36 ` Johannes Schindelin
2005-11-18 18:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-11-18 16:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-18 17:26 ` Andreas Ericsson
2005-11-18 17:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-17 23:32 ` Johannes Schindelin
2005-11-18 1:40 ` Martin Langhoff
2005-11-18 2:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-18 2:53 ` Johannes Schindelin
2005-11-17 23:18 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2005-11-17 23:30 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=437D0FC8.6000906@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=junkio@cox.net \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).