git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] git-daemon support for user-relative paths.
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 12:41:32 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <437E3C7C.6000303@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <437DAA66.6070301@op5.se>

Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> 
> It's already there but in a different format. Adding "if (!strict)" to 
> the previously unconditional 'chdir(".git");' won't change that.
> 
> Like I said, I made sure everything that worked before works now too.
> 
>> Under strict-path, I think not doing any DWIM like this is fine,
>> but otherwise I suspect changing this would break existing
>> remotes/origin file people may have.  In addition enter_repo()
>> as posted does its own DWIM to chdir to ".git" unconditionally
>> as I pointed out...
> 
> DWIM? That's an acronym I don't know.
> 

DWIM = "Do What I Mean", i.e. program trying to be clever.  A (usually) 
good thing for usability, a very bad thing for security.

In particular, DWIM is bad for security when you have a flow like:

	user input -> security check -> DWIM

... which lets the user subvert the security check by knowing how the 
DWIM will mangle the input.  What's worse, programmers like yourself 
frequently say "oh, it's okay, though, I know what the DWIM does and it 
can't break the security checks I do."

Well, then someone comes along and changes either the security checks 
(e.g. add a blacklist), or the DWIM, or both.  Security hole opens.

Therefore, the flow must *ALWAYS* be:

	user input -> DWIM -> security check


Your patch re-introduces the incorrect flow.

	-hpa

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-11-18 20:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-17 19:37 [PATCH 5/5] git-daemon support for user-relative paths Andreas Ericsson
2005-11-18  0:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-11-18 10:18   ` Andreas Ericsson
2005-11-18 17:57     ` Matthias Urlichs
2005-11-18 20:41     ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2005-11-18 21:13     ` Junio C Hamano
2005-11-18 23:19     ` Junio C Hamano
2005-11-18 23:45       ` Andreas Ericsson
2005-11-21  9:28         ` Junio C Hamano
2005-11-21  9:49           ` Junio C Hamano
2005-11-21 11:10           ` Andreas Ericsson
2005-11-21 23:29             ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=437E3C7C.6000303@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=ae@op5.se \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=junkio@cox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).