From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: Rss produced by git is not valid xml? Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 15:34:29 -0800 Message-ID: <437E6505.8000201@zytor.com> References: <200511181833.40048.ismail@uludag.org.tr> <200511182127.06958.ismail@uludag.org.tr> <20051118200217.GA2831@vrfy.org> <200511182208.24248.ismail@uludag.org.tr> <20051118205513.GA3168@vrfy.org> <437E51EB.7050100@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Kay Sievers , Ismail Donmez , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Nov 19 00:55:44 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EdFlM-0003zI-Tf for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 00:35:25 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751175AbVKRXfH (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2005 18:35:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751179AbVKRXfH (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2005 18:35:07 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([192.83.249.54]:10206 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751175AbVKRXfG (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2005 18:35:06 -0500 Received: from [10.4.1.13] (yardgnome.orionmulti.com [209.128.68.65]) (authenticated bits=0) by terminus.zytor.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jAINYfu6016251 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 18 Nov 2005 15:34:41 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87.1, clamav-milter version 0.87 on localhost X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on terminus.zytor.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Fri, 18 Nov 2005, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >>On the fly conversion on CVS import isn't particularly crazy, as long as it's >>under user control. > > Actually, it is. > > Why? > > How are you going to feed your changes back to the original (and initially > main) project? > > Hint: they're not going to pull from your git tree, are they? > > Ahh. Maybe patches would be a good idea. > > Ooops. > You're assuming there *IS* an original (and initially main) project. There is another usage mode: "we're dumping CVS and switching to this new-fangled git thing." I have myself done this with several projects by now. -hpa