From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Ericsson Subject: Re: Rss produced by git is not valid xml? Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 00:53:32 +0100 Message-ID: <437E697C.7090307@op5.se> References: <200511181833.40048.ismail@uludag.org.tr> <200511182127.06958.ismail@uludag.org.tr> <20051118200217.GA2831@vrfy.org> <200511182208.24248.ismail@uludag.org.tr> <20051118205513.GA3168@vrfy.org> <437E51EB.7050100@zytor.com> <437E6505.8000201@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Nov 19 01:21:12 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EdG2z-0000uw-Bz for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 00:53:37 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751101AbVKRXxe (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2005 18:53:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751119AbVKRXxe (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2005 18:53:34 -0500 Received: from linux-server1.op5.se ([193.201.96.2]:13025 "EHLO smtp-gw1.op5.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751101AbVKRXxe (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2005 18:53:34 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.19] (1-2-9-7a.gkp.gbg.bostream.se [82.182.116.44]) by smtp-gw1.op5.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26B046BCFE for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 00:53:33 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc3 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: git@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <437E6505.8000201@zytor.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Linus Torvalds wrote: > >> >> On Fri, 18 Nov 2005, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> >>> On the fly conversion on CVS import isn't particularly crazy, as long >>> as it's >>> under user control. >> >> >> Actually, it is. >> >> Why? >> >> How are you going to feed your changes back to the original (and >> initially main) project? >> >> Hint: they're not going to pull from your git tree, are they? >> >> Ahh. Maybe patches would be a good idea. >> >> Ooops. >> > > You're assuming there *IS* an original (and initially main) project. > > There is another usage mode: "we're dumping CVS and switching to this > new-fangled git thing." I have myself done this with several projects > by now. > I'm guessing Linus' scenario is more common. I do it myself and I'd like it to keep working. -- Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@op5.se OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231