From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Ericsson Subject: Re: Rss produced by git is not valid xml? Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 09:49:46 +0100 Message-ID: <437EE72A.3050704@op5.se> References: <200511181833.40048.ismail@uludag.org.tr> <200511182127.06958.ismail@uludag.org.tr> <20051118200217.GA2831@vrfy.org> <200511182208.24248.ismail@uludag.org.tr> <20051118205513.GA3168@vrfy.org> <437E51EB.7050100@zytor.com> <437E6505.8000201@zytor.com> <437E697C.7090307@op5.se> <437E7E3E.4040303@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Nov 19 09:50:13 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EdOPu-0005iD-1X for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 09:49:50 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750974AbVKSItr (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Nov 2005 03:49:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750975AbVKSItr (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Nov 2005 03:49:47 -0500 Received: from linux-server1.op5.se ([193.201.96.2]:27874 "EHLO smtp-gw1.op5.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750877AbVKSItr (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Nov 2005 03:49:47 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.19] (1-2-9-7a.gkp.gbg.bostream.se [82.182.116.44]) by smtp-gw1.op5.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E2996BCFE for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 09:49:46 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc3 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: git@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <437E7E3E.4040303@zytor.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Andreas Ericsson wrote: > >>> >>> You're assuming there *IS* an original (and initially main) project. >>> >>> There is another usage mode: "we're dumping CVS and switching to this >>> new-fangled git thing." I have myself done this with several >>> projects by now. >> >> >> I'm guessing Linus' scenario is more common. I do it myself and I'd >> like it to keep working. >> > > I'm not arguing that. I'm arguing that the *option* might be useful. > Isn't it already? You can install and use any hooks you like after all. -- Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@op5.se OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231