Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> writes:
> 
> 
>>Okay, in that post Linus suggests that -M without an argument should be 
>>== 100% (1.0), thus avoiding having to mess up the meaning of -M100 as 
>>0.100.  It seems like a really odd thing to have -M100 mean something 
>>that's completely out of line with the rest of the meaning.
> 
> True, but it might be too late to change that; I suspect people
> expect -M to do a bit more than pure renames by now.
> 

Okay, how about the following?  It lets both -M1.0 and -M100% work, 
while keeping everything else compatible, and avoiding artificial 
special cases.

	-hpa