From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] daemon whitelist handling (Re: git pull aborts in 50% of cases)
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 11:41:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4391F4DD.2060002@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vzmnivuz8.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> For example, I can by mistake create a symbolic link:
>
> ln -s /home /pub/scm/git/git.git/oops
>
> now accesses /pub/scm/git/oops/hpa/secret.git/ is not
> restricted. We could hand-resolve the each level from the
> request to see if no "funny" symbolic links are involved, but
> what is the definition of "funny"? When we see /pub pointing at
> somewhere in /mnt/disk47/slice31, we should not complain. When
> we see "oops" under git in the above example, we would want to
> complain. These things are hard to get right.
>
Actually, it's a policy decision whether or not symlinks should be
allowed to exit space like that; in Apache, for example, it's a
configurable.
> I tend to say that the 0.99.9k (and the current master) rule to
> make validation always work on what getcwd() gives back is
> easier to understand (which generally means safer). Can I talk
> you into adjusting your whitelist on kernel.org machines?
I'm not happy about it, but it's not a huge deal on kernel.org.
However, I think it's the wrong thing, especially in the light of
allowing user-relative paths.
At the very least, if you insist on using getcwd() names, you should
pre-canonicalize the whitelist, too.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-03 19:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-02 19:04 git pull aborts in 50% of cases Alexey Dobriyan
2005-12-02 18:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-12-02 21:12 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2005-12-02 21:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-12-02 21:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-12-03 2:18 ` Johannes Schindelin
2005-12-03 2:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-12-03 4:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-12-03 9:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-12-03 19:21 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-12-03 19:30 ` [RFC] daemon whitelist handling (Re: git pull aborts in 50% of cases) Junio C Hamano
2005-12-03 19:41 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2005-12-03 19:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-03 21:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-12-03 21:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-12-03 20:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-12-03 20:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4391F4DD.2060002@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=junkio@cox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).