From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: gitk - ewww Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 22:05:15 -0800 Message-ID: <4392871B.1030300@zytor.com> References: <6CC092B0-101F-4D98-9761-B4E24A7CA35A@hawaga.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ben Clifford , Git Mailing List X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Dec 04 07:06:26 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ein0X-0006if-B5 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 07:05:57 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932204AbVLDGFy (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Dec 2005 01:05:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751318AbVLDGFy (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Dec 2005 01:05:54 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([192.83.249.54]:45542 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751317AbVLDGFx (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Dec 2005 01:05:53 -0500 Received: from [172.27.0.18] (c-67-180-238-27.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.180.238.27]) (authenticated bits=0) by terminus.zytor.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jB465Ggi024050 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 3 Dec 2005 22:05:17 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87.1, clamav-milter version 0.87 on localhost X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL autolearn=no version=3.0.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on terminus.zytor.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Sun, 4 Dec 2005, Ben Clifford wrote: > >>Screen shot is at: >>http://www/hawaga.org.uk/ben/tech/gitk-eww-1.png > > > Yes. gitk doesn't look wonderful with octopus merges, the lines start > crossing. Oh well. I think you have to live with it, it's done this for a > long time. > > What makes _me_ go "eww" in that screenshot is that tcl/tk doesn't do > anti-aliased fonts, but maybe that's just me, and that's apparently 8.5 > has that fixed (at a horrible performance impact, I'm sure, but hey, one > look at your screenshot and I'm saying "bring it on"). > It usually work OK for me, running on Fedora Core 4. Clearly, though, it's Tcl/Tk version dependent; especially since it looks absolutely *awful* on Cygwin. -hpa