From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: Wine + GIT Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 14:01:49 -0500 Message-ID: <4395E01D.4080107@pobox.com> References: <4394CD68.8020500@codeweavers.com> <4394F173.6000505@pobox.com> <20051206170803.GD17457@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Mike McCormack , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Dec 06 20:05:11 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eji5W-0004ch-Kg for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 20:02:55 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030186AbVLFTCG (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2005 14:02:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030191AbVLFTCF (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2005 14:02:05 -0500 Received: from mail.dvmed.net ([216.237.124.58]:61847 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030187AbVLFTCC (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2005 14:02:02 -0500 Received: from cpe-069-134-188-146.nc.res.rr.com ([69.134.188.146] helo=[10.10.10.88]) by mail.dvmed.net with esmtpsa (Exim 4.52 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Eji4Y-0003uP-9D; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 19:01:56 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: "J. Bruce Fields" In-Reply-To: <20051206170803.GD17457@fieldses.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "srv2.dvmed.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 09:03:31PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >>2) The "git-foo" commands are apparently uncool. "git foo ..." is >>preferred. > > > How does e.g. git-diff differ from git diff? I thought they were > equivalent.--b. [...] Content analysis details: (0.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address [69.134.188.146 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 09:03:31PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >>2) The "git-foo" commands are apparently uncool. "git foo ..." is >>preferred. > > > How does e.g. git-diff differ from git diff? I thought they were > equivalent.--b. The specific git-diff-XXX command example was longer. In general, there is not much difference, except that I was admonished to avoid the git-XXX in my howto. I suppose that makes sense if the git-XXX programs are moved out of $prefix/bin, leaving only $prefix/bin/git. Jeff